MUH GLOBALISTS

If the Globalists really were in charge, they would have left this guy alone.

by Colin Liddell

I just clicked on the latest RamZPaul video to see if he had anything interesting to add to the commentary on the Swedish election.

I mean this really needs explaining: a country that used to be such a paradise for everybody is now well on its way to becoming a Third World shithole, but when they get a chance to express a little dissent with this destiny less than a fifth of the voters bother.

So what's the often incisive boomer's take on things from his holiday home in Budapest? Well, according to RamZPaul it's all down to "the Globalists." Really, dude, you're starting to sound like Alex Jones—God bless him—who is to informed opinion what pro-wrestling is to actual sports.

But don't just blame RamZ. Everyone in the Dissident Right has been leaning too heavily on the G-word for some years now, including many who publish at this site. But, really, this whole "Muh globalists" thing is becoming tiresome. If it doesn't send up a whiff of irony in your mind by now, then you're probably well on your way to the David Icke compound by now. The term "Globalist" (((echo quotes optional))) is just one more played out, overused meme of that busted flush that used to be called the Alt-Right.

The word has its uses but mainly as a convenient place holder for more nebulous and hard-to-pin-down forces and factors that would just make us sound tongue-tied and twisted if we tried to explicate them on a livestream, so yeh, "dem Globalists!" will sometimes do in tight spot.

The word is also favoured for another reason, because it is all things to all men, some seeing it a ban-proof stand-in for Jewwwwwwws, others as a critique of nasty, selfish billionaires, WASPs, Freemasons, Lizard People, etc. Think of it as a kind of cosy unifying device in a particularly fractious movement.

Typical Globalist, too detached from reality to control it.

But really, the word does more to obfuscate than explain, more to "pamper and comfort" than "raise anger to confront" the very real problems that bedevil our clearly dying civilisation.

The problem we face is not the Globalists, and thinking that it's the Globalists is part of the problem.

But just saying that to many in the Dissident Right and the "Altosphere" is like cruelly pulling away a spergy child's comfort blanket. But, whatever...

So, let's start by going along with what can be called the "Globalist Hypothesis," and just assume that there is, in fact, such a thing as a tightly coordinated group of super-powerful rich, Jewish, or Freemasonic people pulling all the strings to create the "Globohomo" World in which feminism and homosexuality destroy the White race while mass immigration floods our ancestral homelands with hordes of Muslims and Africans.

The obvious question to ask is: Why anyone would bother creating what in effect is a Global Mogadishu? 

If I were part of the Globalist Cabal that the "Globalist Hypothesis" postulates, I would be making the case for "reversing the polarity" and, instead of turning Stockholm into Mogadishu, I would be all for turning Mogadishu into Stockholm by pushing up White birth rates and encouraging mass European emigration to the Third World to turn it into something increasingly Europeanised, civilised, and high tech. This would not only boost my billions into trillions, it would also mean I wouldn't be surrounded by an alien horde that hates me and would probably eat me and my children at some future date.

What every globalist wants, according to the Globalist Hypothesis.

The idea that a global elite would have Mogadishu as their global ideal is thus clearly retarded.

So, if we are to suspend our hatred and blame of the Globalists and take a bit of time to look elsewhere, who are we to blame for the incontrovertible fact that our World is nevertheless sliding towards the Golgotha of a Global Mogadishu?

Well, let's go back to Sweden.

Sweden, as you may have heard, has some of the best welfare, maternity care, paternity leave, and childcare facilities in the World. It also has some of the highest living standards in the World and plenty of opportunities for women, regardless of marital, maternal, and biological status. Having kids there is essentially a walk in the park, with almost no serious career or lifestyle drawbacks.

Wypipo

In this respect it is not so different from other Scandinavian and European countries, many of which have the same or similar benefits and facilities, as well as plenty of tolerance for whatever a woman wants to do with her body. But, despite all that—and despite not having much else to do for most of the year due to the long winters—Swedes still manage to have a negative fertility rate of only 1.88 (up from a few years ago when it was 1.5).

This is the same with "Wypipo" everywhere. In Developed Asia, where the public support, maternity care, and childcare drops off a bit, the fertility rates are even lower. In Japan, where I presently find myself, it is 1.46, a big improvement on the 1.26 from around ten years ago.

But, still, compared to the past, it has never been easier for women to have babies in all of these developed countries. Yet they don't.

Now the fact is, if a modern, developed economy is not demographically stable, it will be forced to import "replacement population" one way or the other. This is a cast iron economic rule under our present economic system. To escape from this would require the kind of top-down, authoritarian system with lots of austerity that people in the developed West are simply unwilling to countenance. A country can be as nationalistic as it pleases, as RamZPaul's beloved Hungary is, but if it aspires to the same freedoms and affluence that we currently "enjoy" it too has the same stark choice: either loosen the wombs of your women or the gates of your borders, and, on present evidence, it's almost always the second option that wins out.

Even in Japan these forces are starting to work their way through the society, with the numbers of "New Japanese" rapidly creeping upwards despite fake Alt-Right memes to the contrary. Remember, I actually live here!

According to the Globalist Hypothesis, the reason birth rates are falling is all down to Globalist propaganda directed at First World women to have careers, be independent man-hating feminists, and put off having kids till their ovaries are burned out.

Again, what is the motivation for this, as I'm sure most of these evil globalists are banging hot blonde chicks, or in the case of George Soros his very own J-waifu? Why would they be wanting to replace this:

or this:

with this?

Remember, according to the Globalist Hypothesis, these guys are super intelligent, can do what the fuck they want, control everything in the World, and can reshape it in any way they want, and we are to believe that they really, really, really want to turn it into a Global Mogadishu.

Sorry, I just don't buy it, which is why it is time to bring in Occam's Razor, the ever-reliable dictum that tells us, "More things should not be used than are necessary [to explain something]."

The suicide of the West can be more simply attributed to the simple fact that, given the freedom to choose, people, and especially women, simply prefer lifestyles that involve negative reproduction rates. The so-called propaganda that the Globalist conspiritards bang on about is simply the media attempting to blow smoke up their arses, saying "You go girl" and "Please shop here."

These problems are inherent in any society that overvalues materialism, the individual, and freedom, as all Western and economically developed societies do. In fact, this is not even a Left/Right problem at its heart, it is just a massive, inherent flaw in the system, backed up by the fact that there is a clear lack of political agency in dealing with it. Meanwhile, the only part of the political or metapolitical spectrum that seems even remotely aware of it—the different parts of the Dissident Right—mainly wants to use it to blackpill itself and/or push its favourite paranoias.

This is the "problem interface" that has to be tackled, hopefully with solutions that we concoct ourselves rather than ones that are forced upon us, like this:

At last! A demographically healthy society in the West.

So, it's time to stop blaming the poor, innocent Globalists, unless you're going to pathetically latch onto the retarded notion that at some secret meeting held in the 1950s the evil Lizard people decided to give the great mass of Western European people exactly what they wanted—lifestyles defined by affluence, individualism, and moral freedom—in the sure and certain knowledge that this would be the easiest way to destroy them and terraform the planet into "Lizard World" via a few decades as a Global Mogadishu.

Connected content:
The IQ of Revolutions

___________________________________

Follow @cbliddell

Colin Liddell is the Chief Editor of Neokrat and the author of Interviews & Obituaries, a collection of encounters with the dead and the famous. Support his work by buying it here (USA), here (UK), and here (Australia).