Recent Articles

Post Top Ad

Your Ad Spot

Friday 26 November 2021

SOME SIMPLE THOUGHTS ON THE CHARLOTTESVILLE TRIAL

Audio Version

The Alt-Right 
by Colin Liddell

To be honest, which I always am, I was disappointed by the result of the Charlottesville trial.

A much better result would have been if the defendants had been hung, drawn, and quartered, and then boiled in oil. I don't say that with any animosity, as I can't help liking some of these characters, whom I now view as
unparalleled comedy buffoons. But what this trial needed to be was the final driving of the nail into the coffin of the Alt-Right and all the failure it represents. 

Unfortunately, the decision, although "crippling" in some respects, won't do enough to kill off the Alt-Right or its zombie afterlife. For years to come we'll be stuck with people like Spencer, Parrott, Heimbach, Cantwell, and Co. bobbing up like bad pennies, claiming -- and even possibly believing -- that they've found the magic key: "Really, bro, trust me, this time it'll work, we can still save Western civilisation. Just send me some more superchats n' crypto."

It looks like there will be a drawn-out appeals process that will go on and on
and on, allowing yet more "victim signalling," grifting, and focus on unimportant things.

Also, the decision at Charlottesville didn't even touch large parts of the Alt-Right.
Russian-backed TRS and Counter-Currents got off scot free. Somehow self-acknowledged Jewish Nazi Mike Enoch managed to wriggle out of the case, and of course "Grindr" Greg Johnson wouldn't have had anything to do with a project so closely associated with his arch nemesis Spencer, whom he resembles in so many ways. So, there is plenty left to resurrect the failed strategy of Nazifying American nationalism and White identitarianism, which of course also means ensuring its failure.

The self-ghettoising and self-castrating
Alt-Right panotheory of Jews as "all-powerful demons" responsible for all the evils in the World will keep chugging along in the dank places of the internet, and even get a boost from the dysfunctionality of Democrat-run America and the fall-out from the Covid crisis. It will certainly remain strong enough to burn up most of the dissident oxygen out there, ensuring that no potent right-wing critique can evolve to challenge the toxic status quo.

So, yes, really, the hanging, drawing, and quartering, along with the boiling in oil of Spencer and Co. would have been best for everybody -- including Spencer and Co.

Nationalists are making substantial if erratic progress in Europe, because the kind of stupidity that flourishes in America is outright banned over there. But unfortunately, the cancer that is American Alt-Rightism appears to have infected other Anglo countries like Britain and Australia. 

A cursory listen will reveal that many Dissident Right vloggers, podcasters, and content creators in those countries have acquired an Alt-Right world view, in which the inherent toxic effects of Western modernity are simply re-categorised as "crimes by the Jews against the Goyim." This would be "Big if True," but it's clearly a load of bull crap because there is a whole range of much simpler and more compelling explanations for all the negative trends we see. 

Mass immigration and "The Great Replacement" is inevitable in any society, like the West, that has an affluent economy and a fertility rate hovering around or below the 1.5 mark. 

Also an affluent economy and a fertility rate hovering around or below the 1.5 mark is exactly what those people in those societies wanted. I speak as someone who resides in Japan, which is heading in exactly the same direction without Jewish control of every aspect of the media and academia, as Alt-Righters claim is the cause in the West. 

Nothing to do with Jews. Women, if given enough individual freedom -- an inherent value of modern Western societies -- simply don't want to have kids that much, unfortunately. That is the problem, not anything written by some Jewish "Cultural Marxist" intellectual in unintelligible prose 70 years ago, nor anything by some lesbian Jewish feminist Guardian columnist that no normal woman has read.
Yes, the Jews "forced" her to have a career, be picky about men, and keep a cat.

What about the spate of "racially charged" cases in America recently -- Kyle Rittenhouse, the Xmas Parade Massacre in Waukeesha, and the "jogger" slaying in Georgia? These have all been cited as "evidence" that "they" hate White people, even though most of the "theys" supposedly doing the hating of the White people are, ahem, White people themselves. 

That should warn you that what you are encountering is convoluted "Ptolemaic thinking." A much simpler "Copernican" explanation for all the evidence generated by these cases is that America is engaged in a messy attempt at social cohesion and inclusivity, which is kind of what you have to do when you have around 40 million Blacks in your country and similar or larger numbers, respectively, of bleeding heart liberals and Christians. 

Calling Blacks "low IQ," "impulsive," or "racially inferior" and re-arranging society accordingly is not really a realistic option for the kind of society America is. Best to pretend "we're all equal" and "we're all individuals" and use a little fake White blaming to explain the awkward disparities in achievement. This kind of ad hoc solution is typical of short-termist societies like those in the West. 

That incredible "joined up" Alt-Right thinking again.
Simpler explanations can almost always be found for most of the Dissident Right's bugbears. What about cherished Alt-Right myths about "Cultural Marxists," (Marxist) Critical Race Theory, and LGBTQ+ education in the classroom?

Once you exclude piss-poor Democrat politicians who want to raise the debt ceiling by trillions to make their jobs easier, and have a weak, non-judgemental attitude to bad life choices made by their voters, then the term "Cultural Marxists" becomes almost irrelevant, except to describe a few harmless lunatics in university humanities departments.

As for CRT-and-LGBTQ+-pushing educators... Sure some of them might be "genuine Lefties" and even pedos, but, let's be honest, most of them are just chronically ignored teachers, out their depth, desperate to find something,
anything, that their education-adverse "students" will pay even the slightest attention to.

See, how much more real and satisfying simple explanations feel compared to signing on to some ming-mongingly convoluted 'Conspiracy Theory' that everything is part of a giant ZOG plot "run by pedophiliac Jewish billionaires" who just want to turn the West into a giant version of Somalia "because reasons..." 

Let's be clear, the problem is not just the Nazis who went on trial at Charlottesville (and, yes, most of them are actual Nazis) or the Nazis at TRS, Counter-Currents, etc., who didn't go on trial. It's the wider problem of poor analysis and the zero-agency, emotionally-incontinent conspiritard thinking it promotes. 

Nobody would think Paul Joseph Watson is a Nazi, right? But, essentially, his whole schtick -- that is "they" "them" "evil globalists" "George Soros, boo hiss" -- is just anti-Semitism without the Jew. 

For PJW bad things are happening not because they are inherent in toxic Western modernity, which gives simple ape-like creatures too much comfort and choice, but because a group of demonic beings are making those things happen. No doubt that sits a lot easier with someone who once enthusiastically gushed about how excited he was to "check out Prague's gay nightlife." 

PJW and "friend" (yes, the "you-know-whos" caused this as well)

Whether it is the Alt-Right's "inverted Jewish supremacism" or the Alt-Lite "anti-Semitism without the Jew" conspiritardary these modes of thought  are equivalent to primitivist logic, ascribing various physical ailments to the actions of unseen devils and calling in a witch doctor or sprinkling salt or holy water on the dying person.

So, what am I saying here? To use an emotionally neutral metaphor, chosen entirely for its descriptive quality, it is this: that the Alt-Right/ Dissident Right of today is a putrescent maggot-filled scab of ignorance, paranoia, cope, and delusion perched on the gaping -- and possibly fatal -- wound of Western modernity. 

What is needed is accurate diagnosis and prognosis, followed by clinical surgery and perfect hygiene. But none of that is likely to happen in the aftermath of the relative leniency shown at the Charlottesville trial.

___________________________________

Colin Liddell was the Chief Editor of Affirmative Right and the author of Interviews & Obituaries, a collection of encounters with the dead and the famous. He now blogs at NeoKrat. Support his work by buying it here (USA), here (UK), and here (Australia). 


11 comments:

  1. Mike Enoch took a genetic test to prove he's not Jewish. Is this not common knowledge?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Funny how Wignats who never trust Jews suddenly trust them when they say they took a genetic test to pretend they're not Jewish LOL

      Delete
  2. I think you’re too young to remember the process it wasn’t shrugged off it was untimely ripped yes there was failure by wasp elites but they were rolled by Jews. Even moldberg for once let slip in that Tucker interview that it mattered who John Reed met at Harvard. Ideas matter who takes power matters
    Sure elements of the alt right are silly maybe counterproductive. But neo reaction was at least as retarded both had some good stuff as well as do the old reactionary right.
    I don’t see how any model succeeds that’s not an ethno state sure Jews are no less white than say Bulgarians Persians and they have much too offer but with rare exceptions they never ever assimilate it’s crazy even now non religious and married out they still see themselves as chosen and us as goyim
    Elites must see themselves paternally for a people it’s culture and nation to survive

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mr Lidell seems to be purely ractionary to anything that is in relation with the "alt-right" so actual real detrimental policies that are being pushed through the lens of critical race theory or "anti-racism" must be a myth, or mass immigration and demographic displacement not being from groups and agents who wish our destruction but only because of economic factors or fertility and if you believe overwise it a conspiracy theory because someone in the diss right he has a personal grudge mentions it so it with must be wrong. Very childish and counter-productive, the only thing I do agree on is all the nazi larping and clinging on to outdated ideologies or fixating on one particular group is hampering any real progress in diss circles.

      Delete
    2. You seem to get it that my animus is against the Nazifying tendency in the Alt-Right. Oddly, all my "grudges" -- TRS, Greg Johnson, Richard Spencer, Millennial Woes, etc. -- ALL occurred when I pushed back against this. It is not some trivial cosmetic optics thing either as your shoddy comment implies, but deeply embedded in the entire Dissident Right as an architectural feature. That would be no problem if it was correct analysis, but, if you have been reading our content at all, you will know that that is not the case.

      Delete
    3. I don't deny that Nazyifiny tendencies are embedded in the "alt-right" or diss right in general, it is totally spot on, and it is a problem, but that is more because no one offers any substantial alternative, and the thought leaders who push against the nazitard stuff just don't cut it, as Pilleater has pointed out "the movement" tends to gravitate around rather transgressive figure heads and turns into a impotent sub-culture with no point of return, a negative reccouring cycle of sorts. I never said it was 'trivial' or an 'optics thing' I said you have a personal grudge, which you clearly do, I can understand why you would be pissed off, I used to read the old alternative right blog, it was a breath of fresh air without all the nazi trappings or winks to the muh nazis. I is a shame it tunred all to dogshit,it could have tunred into something more substantial if it wasn't for cults of personality like Spencer. I just don't see how talking about CRT or even cultural marxism ( which some of your articles talk about) are some how 'myths' and it is just 'a few harmless lunatics' that is not true, all these destructive ideas flow out the mouths of are enemies. If anything the diss right has been completely useless, none of them have even really tried to rubute CRT or anti-racism they would rather makes videos of out-dated marxist economics or Nrx guff that has been said before. The classical libtards have been more effective combating CRT and they only do it because they know it looks bad, not because they actually disagree with the underlying premises of it. Anyway Mr Lidell, I not writing this to stick up for the "alt-right" or any of the people you have mentioned, it is more out of frustration of how impotent the diss right is in general, to me there is nothing positive being put on the table, it is just endless slagging matches between the former thought members of the "alt-right."

      Delete
  3. Japan is dominated by American liberalism, they so under de facto Jewish rule. Also, foreigners only make up 2% of Japan's population, and the vast majority of those are East/Southeast Asian.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL, you've ended up arguing against yourself here. Basically you've ended up saying "Japan is completely ruled by American liberalism so they are a 98% ethnostate." Really, you have to get your story straight. Which is it "based ethnostate" or "Jewed Western colony"? Please make up your mind. Also check your shoelaces aren't tied together - I hate to see you crack your skull.

      Delete
    2. Amusing. But you're right, "rule" might have been too strong a word. Japan's wokeism and second/third wave feminism are caricatures and byproducts of American influence on the country. These ideas were driven to the fore in America largely due to Jewish activism. At the same time, Japan's demographics are what they are despite being at or below the 1.5 birth rate mark for many years. So, it seems there is a limit to this Judeo-American influence. I doubt Japan will start importing non-East/Southeast Asians en masse, but if they should, you can't say it's because American culture (and Jews by proxy) has no effect on the country.

      This notion that mass immigration is an inevitable response to low birth rates is overly simplistic and doesn't line up with reality. There are plenty of relatively affluent countries around the world not engaging in demographic replacement with lower birth rates than those that are. In America's case, our current immigration policy stems from decades and decades of Jewish agitation led by the American Jewish Congress. The Immigration Act of 1965 had nothing to do with birth rates.

      Really though, how politically difficult would it be to criminalize adultery again and ban pornography? Is popular support for these things just that overwhelming?

      Delete
    3. Like a lot of Jew-obsessed Alt-Righters you clearly don't understand the 1965 Immigration Act -- or simply choose to misrepresent it. The 1924 law it overturned had ZERO restrictions on immigration from the Western hemisphere. The 1965 Hart-Celler Act by contrast limited immigration from the Western Hemisphere to 120,000 per year and 20,000 per nation. The massive rise in immigration subsequently was driven by massive population growth in Latin America, the globalising economy, and some 'loopholes' like family reunification provisions (supported, of course, by Christian churches). It can be argued that immigration would have been even higher if the 1924 system, which WASP elites supported for cheap labour reasons, had been retained.

      Delete
  4. Plunging fertility will ultimately doom advanced nations unless there is some kind of ‘magic bullet’ technological advancement which pushes us into a post scarcity society (actual Communism) which is looking increasingly unlikely. The problem isn’t so much the women who aren’t having children (I observe that if a woman has doubts about parenthood then more often than not it’s probably for the best) but that women who do want children are hanging smaller families. We would have had five or six children of time had allowed. Alas in our late 30s we have settled for three. Some blame women for prioritising their own financial autonomy but I don’t. It’s just that civilisation on the long term probably can’t afford for women to have the same financial standing as men independently of men.

    ReplyDelete

Your comment will appear after it has been checked for spam, trolling, and hate speech.

Post Top Ad

Your Ad Spot

Pages