SUPPORT FREE SPEECH: ROOSH ON HIS RECENT BANNING FROM AMAZON

There is a lot on both sides that can be said about Roosh, the manosphere dating guru. Like most of us, he has his good points and his bad points. But one thing is clear, the recent SPLC-inspired decision by Amazon to ban his new book Game, just as it was breaking into the top 1000 best-sellers, is an attack on all voices on the Dissident Right. Show your support for Roosh as he struggles to adjust to his new situation by drinking copious amounts of soy juice to lower his testosterone and reduce his anger issues over the banning.

EYE FROM THE RIGHT: "THE MAN IN THE HIGH CASTLE"

Contemporary Media seen from the Right

by Richard Wolstencroft

Be careful what you wish for, so they say. Well, in Alt-Right circles, the idea of the Axis winning World War II might have some appeal. That’s what makes this Phillip K. Dick adaptation so compelling and even thrilling. It takes a look at a United States conquered by the Axis, and some of the intrigues this generates.

The geopolitics is certainly fun: everything from New York City now with a giant SS Building in the middle of it (echoes of Trump Tower?) all the way to the Mid West finding its "inner Teuton" as part of the Greater German Reich. There is also a thin sliver of "Free America" – a kind of no-man’s land or DMZ, the natural place for renegades and refugees – stretching from Denver down to Mexico. Then there is the West Coast, where instead of a patronizing interest in Zen and sushi, the Golden State and a few others are all part of the Empire of Japan. So, far so good!

DID THE FEDS ORDER AMAZON.COM TO STOP SELLING THE CONFEDERATE BATTLE FLAG?

by Andy Nowicki

According to certain accounts of the communications of some customers with Amazon.com employees, two of which are saved in screenshots seen below, the recent decision of the company to stop selling the Confederate battle flag was apparently made under coercion from the federal government.

MASTURBATION AND MISANDRY

What's sauce for the goose
is probably porn for the gander

by Andy Nowicki

In a prior article posted at Alternative Right and afterwards republished at another *site*, I discussed what I felt to be the misandric double standards which adhere to contemporary writers of erotic-themed literature who happen to be phallically-afflicted; that is, male. In short, women who write explicit sex scenes are applauded for not being repressed – you go, girl! — while men who do the same are looked at askance as queasy perverts, creepy stalkers, and likely rapists. It is part of a general cultural Zeitgeist-sponsored trend which promotes obstreperous expressions of female sexuality as good and proper exercises in ‘sex-positivity’ and ‘empowerment’, while denigrating male arousal as something altogether icky and gross.