Showing posts with label Hollywood Nazis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hollywood Nazis. Show all posts

DEFENDING ANDREW ANGLIN AND QUESTIONING THE FUTURE OF THE ALT-RIGHT

/pol/

As the Alt Right attempts to find its balance after the election of Donald Trump threw it into “and now what’s next?” mode, it is clear that the most entertaining sites — The Daily Stormer and The Right Stuff — command a huge amount of traffic. This has caused an impulse among many Alt Right sites to imitate this classic formula.

However, this runs into what we may call “the Stormfront Effect,” which is what happens when a relatively small but very active group online seems to represent more of public opinion than it actually does, at least until people realize that this group consists of people who are mostly minor participants in our society. Then, people stop giving it credence.

THE KURSK STRATEGY

TL;DR: Don’t go full Nazi.

by James Lawrence

Late last year, the ‘Hailgate’ incident ignited a furious war of words on the Alt-Right, centring on the use of Nazi rhetoric and imagery by people in our movement.

In my view, most people in the Alt-Right took the correct line: viewing the incident as a failure, chastising those responsible, but not overreacting and cutting ties with the movement as a whole. Those who did try to distance themselves were wrong: four drunkards doing Nazi salutes in an audience of more than three hundred is pretty damn respectable, especially at a time when 'mainstream' heads of state were puffing on Fidel Castro’s dead mass-murdering Commie cigar.

A SURFEIT OF BRACKETS: (((DAILY STORMERISM))) AND (((HOLLYWOOD NAZISM))) VS. THE ALT-RIGHT

Hollywood Nazi: "Lights, cameras, achtung!"

by Colin Liddell

I am still not certain about the exact nature of Andrew Anglin and The Daily Stormer, a site that seems to have a rather inflated opinion of itself. But my best guess at the moment is that it is a psy-ops operation, set up by, and serving, Jewish interests. Some of you may also have your doubts about the site, others not, but, as someone who has been in the Alt-Right from the start and has written for all its main outlets – Radix, Occidental Observer, Counter-Currents, TRS, and American Renaissance – and has a knowledge of attempts to stifle nationalism in other countries, you may wish to humour me in my suspicions, and see how I arrived at them. It should at least make for some interesting reading.
Because I believe with a fair degree of certainty that the Stormer is inspired by a certain radical Jewish agenda, I will henceforth refer to it, its associates, and its derivatives with echo brackets ((())), so that certain patterns will be lucidly clear. 
Well, let's begin at the beginning...

THE DUMBEST PEOPLE EVER: THE NAZIFICATION OF WHITENESS



The latest emotional spasm in the media over Gaza is nothing new. The matter of Israeli brutality (which is largely beyond doubt) and the resultant, predictable outrage from the usual quarters, is so recurrent and predictable that it has practically become a Western tradition in its own right, with its own coded language and ritual and putative ‘outsiders’ who ‘don’t get it’. Criticism of Israel and Zionists is of course perfectly understandable and, if I were required to make the choice, Anti-Zionism is the only position I would be prepared to take. However, I have found that there is an additional, third option, which is simply to accept that each side, the Jews and the Arabs, have a right to fight for their existence. This is what is known as neutrality.

It normally involves not making any outward assumptions about the legitimacy or moral superiority of one side or the other and simply letting them fight it out. Some people may be persuaded to reject neutrality in this matter on the basis that ‘our’ governments are aiding the Israelis with military technology and what not, but these are not ‘our’ governments. Western governments are largely under the influence of the Zionist lobby. If they wish to supply and lend favour to their client, Israel, that is a matter for them, but no imperative arises from this for white people to take one side or the other.