"We must work superficially and in large groups, altering the conditions of life and improving the rules of the game." – Louis WirthIntegration – the attempt to place large numbers of Blacks in White living space – is typically and naively seem as an issue that just concerned Blacks and Whites, but the dirty little secret of integration is that it was mainly about Jews.
Showing posts with label integration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label integration. Show all posts
MANSPREADING FOR LEBENSRAUM (PART TWO)
MANSPREADING FOR LEBENSRAUM (PART ONE)
![]() |
| Localized ethnic unity, a threat to the system. |
by Alex Fontana
"Integration is the time between the first black family moving in and the last white family moving out" – Saul Alinsky
As is the Microcosm, so is the Macrocosm
The feminist ‘social justice’ campaign first launched on Twitter against “manspreading” has made the male practice of sitting a little too comfortably in a public space into a criminal offense. The arrests that have resulted from this criminalization of public posture represent a fundamental attack upon our personal freedoms and on our own ability to govern ourselves in social situations without resorting to overarching laws and policing. John Stuart Mill’s Harm Principle has taken a modern, politically correct turn for the worse.
This also represents an attack on males, but even more so on White males, who have literally had their living spaces invaded and have been forced to squeeze aside for the ‘leg room’ of hordes of non-Whites.
WAS ENOCH RIGHT?
The memory of Enoch Powell, a paragon of the political Right, is enjoying something of a resurgence in these ‘diverse’ and ‘vibrant’ times of ethnic plenty.
Mr Powell’s address to a 1968 Conservative party general meeting (now referred to as the Rivers of Blood speech) gave rise to the now frequent utterance and heart-felt proclamation that, “Enoch Was Right!” He was most certainly of the Right, but were Enoch’s motives right and correct, or have modern day nationalists merely been sloppy in their aggrandisement of this totemic political personality?
Mr Powell’s address to a 1968 Conservative party general meeting (now referred to as the Rivers of Blood speech) gave rise to the now frequent utterance and heart-felt proclamation that, “Enoch Was Right!” He was most certainly of the Right, but were Enoch’s motives right and correct, or have modern day nationalists merely been sloppy in their aggrandisement of this totemic political personality?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
Fields is a synonym for soil; blood and soil, anyone? by Daniel Barge The problem with the trial of Alex Fields for the supposed mu...
-
Tabloid headlines are the highest form of historical evidence, apparently. by Colin Liddell Due to the obsessive grip that antisemi...
-
by Colin Liddell The French have a term for it, L’esprit de l’escalier , or “staircase wit.” It means bright and witty sayings though...
-
Affirmative Right chief editor Colin Liddell wishes listeners a happy "St. Andrews Day" and explains why the Scots picked a J...
-
by Colin Liddell @AffirmativRight When the Alt-Right was founded in 2010— in as much as a loose umbrella term can be 'founde...


