Showing posts with label Theresa May. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Theresa May. Show all posts

UKIP GUN IS LOCKED AND LOADED AND POINTING AT THE HEAD OF TORY REMAINERS

by Trad News

Thanks to the turbulence being caused by the Brexit negotiations, UK politics are particularly unstable at the moment.

This could easily lead to the collapse of Prime Minister Theresa May's shambolic government, and we might even see a general election being announced within weeks or even days. After that, who knows what will happen.

ZOMBIE MAY BEING GROOMED TO BECOME A SOFT BREXIT SCAPEGOAT

by Daniel Barge

Yesterday, at their joint press conference at Chequers, Donald Trump tried to make British Prime Minister Theresa May look good. This was after giving her a well-deserved kicking in a recent interview, highlighting her pathetic performance negotiating Brexit with the EU. 

SHORTPOD (25): THE GREAT BREXIT BUST-UP

Affirmative Right Chief Editor Colin Liddell comments on the latest Brexit squabble in Britain's Conservative Party, which has led to the resignations of several government ministers and greatly weakened the minority government of Prime Minister Theresa May.

How will the EU react to the weakening hand of the British government in the Brexit negotiations? Will this situation ensure a Hard Brexit? Will May continue to hang on? Who would likely replace her? 


All this and more will be revealed succinctly and efficiently in the Shortpod, the podcast for people who may not have the endless hours to spend watching YouTube Livestreams.

MAY PUTS POLITICAL NOOSE ROUND HER NECK WITH UNWORKABLE BREXIT DEAL

by Trad News

Make no mistake about it, UK Prime Minister Theresa May is an outstanding political failure, and, like other outstanding female political failures, is only in office because she is a woman—and woman politicians are simply not judged as harshly as their male colleagues, which, on its own, is one reason they shouldn't be in politics. 

COINCIDENCE DETECTOR LIGHTS UP AS UK BLAMES PUTIN & TRUMP SACKS TILLERSON

by Duns Scotus

Without being an "Insider" it is difficult to know exactly what is going on in the world of politics and geopolitics today. In fact, you only have two options—either to be a dupe or a crank, namely to believe everything our "highers and betters" tell us or else to be stubbornly suspicious of it. I prefer the latter.

GALLOWS HUMOUR HUNG OUT TO DRY IN THE UK


Following the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami that killed more than a quarter of a million people in South East Asia, a bar owner in Phuket, one of the towns worst affected, was asked how business was doing. "It's been very quiet," he replied. but some of the regulars are starting to drift back."

Following the 9-11 attacks in New York, in which many policemen and firemen were reduced to ashes, the following joke surfaced:
Q: Why are police and firemen New York's finest?
A: Because now you can run them through a sieve.
Both of the above are extremely "offensive." But they are also examples of gallows humour, a particularly black-tinged variety that is all the funnier for being so. In our increasingly dysfunctional modern age, such black humour is more necessary than ever as a coping mechanism for the various insanities that surround us.

However, it seems that coping with insanity is the last thing the UK government wants its people to do, as it has taken to routinely arresting people for any humour considered “offensive” or “insensitive.”

The latest example is the arrest of Richard Gear Evans, aged 37, for a comment made on Facebook in the wake of the van attack on Muslims leaving the Finsbury Park Mosque. Evans is the the son of the man who owns the van hire company from which the attacker Darren Osborne rented the van used in the attack. A spokeswoman for South Wales Police said Evans had been arrested on suspicion of "displaying threatening abusive / insulting written material with intent / likely to stir up racial hatred" for the following comment:
"It’s my dads company I don’t get involved it’s a shame they don't hire out Steam Rollers or Tanks could have done a tidy job then." 
It seems that since that attack the police have been taking time off from the important business of keeping tabs on Britain’s officially admitted population of over 23,000 known jihadis to instead trawl social media accounts for such examples of “unkind” words.

It is not clear what the consequences of this solitary comment will be, but the timing is certainly an issue. With a spate of Islamist terrorist attacks in London since the announcement of Article 50, a major “third world style” tower fire that burned scores of mainly non-Whites to death, and the government’s extremely narrow and unstable majority in Parliament, the potential for chaos and riots, especially in London, is now extremely high.

Welcome to Maybot Britain: humour does not compute.

This may push the government to attempt to keep a lid on things in a particularly heavy-handed way. For this reason, Evans could well be made an example of for his "unforgivable Islamophobia." Those in authority may well be thinking that only by hanging him out to dry can the multiracial mob be placated and its sons weaned away from the radicalism that once found its home in the very mosque that was the subject of the attack.

But in doing so, they are merely creating a more brittle and fragile situation, because gallows humor exists for a reason and serves a useful function. Sigmund Freud explained it not implausibly by linking it to the human need for stoicism:
"The ego refuses to be distressed by the provocations of reality, to let itself be compelled to suffer. It insists that it cannot be affected by the traumas of the external world; it shows, in fact, that such traumas are no more than occasions for it to gain pleasure."
In 1981  Ronald Reagan produced an excellent example of gallows humour when he was badly wounded by gunman John Hinckley Jr. As he was taken to the emergency room he cheerily quipped to the medical staff, "I hope you're all Republicans."

Taken in the same completely humorless way that the British authorities now take everything said about Muslims, this comment clearly implies that Democrat-voting doctors routinely kill anyone whose political opinions differs from theirs—an obviously extreme and very libelous comment. Treating humorous comments in this way thus creates absurdity. So, what are we to make of Evans’ quip?

First of all, it is ridiculous that we are forced to consider what is an essentially private comment made by an anonymous person as a state and public matter.

But, looking at the comment's content, the message seems to be that things could have been a lot worse (tanks, steamrollers) and that this would not necessarily be such a bad thing. There is also an implication of surprise at the signalling of concern for the mosque, which suggests that Evans is well aware of its history as a hotbed of Islamic radicalism connected to actual terrorists.

Anyone thinking he is literally advocating attacking Muslims with tanks and steamrollers is clearly a moron. But it seems that this is exactly what the British police are—morons choosing to ignore the frivolous gallows humour of the comment and instead robotically interpreting it in the most literal sense.

Of course, this may be how certain low-IQ Muslims also interpret it, but that is merely an argument against creating the kind of conflict-riven multiracial societies where everyone inevitably misunderstands each other all the time. Also, if that is the kind of society you have created, then it is probably not the best idea to use the full Orwellian apparatus of the state and media to blare out the private thoughts and comments of individuals from different groups about each other. Imagine what kinds of insults against "kufars" and infidels you would find from trawling through the social media of the average British Muslim. I'm sure they say plenty of things that could be willfully misinterpreted when they let off steam on their side.

But if gallows humour is a coping mechanism for a society that is deeply flawed and out of balance, then maybe the best way to fix things is to do exactly what the British authorities are doing, namely crack down on Gallows humour. Because, after all, anything that helps a dysfunctional system to function and survive is itself dysfunctional.

Will Britain's new state humorlessness actually lead to its salvation? 

PODCAST 53: ELECTILE DYSFUNCTION



Filmmaker and Alternative Right contributor Richard Wolstencroft delays his trip to the country to join Andy Nowicki and Colin Liddell to discuss the recent UK general election that defied predictions.

Starting off with a 20-point lead in the opinion polls, Prime Minister Theresa May was counting on an easy landslide victory to increase her Parliamentary majority and strengthen her hand in forthcoming Brexit negotiations. In the event, she ended up being humiliated by the "unelectable" Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, stripped of her majority, and forced to get down on her knees to the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) in order to stay in government.

Our panelists uncover what went wrong with May's campaign, and take a closer look at the party that holds the balance of power, Northern Ireland's DUP, a charming throwback to what political parties used to be like when they pursued the interests of their voters.


MAY THE FARCE BE WITH YOU


A Political Corpse Now Leads Britain


The UK general election, which was looking so boring for so long, finally got interesting.

First, let me say that Theresa May’s decision to hold the election was the right one. At the time she was miles ahead in the opinion polls, but her party only had a very narrow majority. To go into Brexit negotiations with such a slim majority would have placed her in a position of weakness with the EU. Britain’s exit promises to be a stormy one, and the government’s popularity is sure to fluctuate.

SHORTPOD (8): A BORING ELECTION GETS A TERRORIST TWIST



Colin Liddell comments on the fake democratic choice of the UK General Election.

When Prime Minister Theresa May called a general election several weeks ago, her Conservative Party was leading the opposition Labour Party by over 20 points in opinion polls. This was supposed to translate into a landslide victory and a massive majority in Parliament, but a weak campaign by May and a restless mood in the country has helped her main opponent, Labour's Jeremy Corbyn, to narrow the gap.

A TALE OF TWO TERRORISMS

Our astounding response!


 When Muslim leaders respond to terrorist attacks on their Christian subjects better than Western leaders do.


Despite the offbeat eccentricity of its leader, the Gaddafi regime played a vital role in maintaining peace and stability in the Mediterranean Basin. When, on a whim, the West decided to use its special forces and air power to oust Gaddafi as part of the Arab Neocon Spring in 2011, it unleashed all sorts of problems.

The Manchester bomb attack was part of the blowback, but so was the much less reported terrorist attack on Coptic Christians in Egypt a few days later, which killed even more people, and also included many children.

THERESA MAY DECIDES TO GO TO THE COUNTRY: START COUNTING THE SPOONS


Theresa May has announced that she wants an early General Election on 8 June. However, this is no longer a simple matter of the PM going to see the Queen and requesting that Parliament be dissolved and an election called. Under the Fixed Term Parliaments Act, Mrs May will require a two thirds majority in the House of Commons to vote to call an early election.

The odds are on May getting a two thirds majority because the leaders of the Labour and LibDem parties, Jeremy Corbyn and Tim Farron have both welcomed the idea of an early election. However, the position is not quite as straightforward as it might seem. The two thirds majority in the Commons is not two thirds of those who vote, but two thirds of the entire Commons personnel, that is, 417 of the 650 MPs. If there is a heavy abstention – the coward’s way out for an MP – May could struggle to reach 417 voting in favour.

WELCOME TO THE NEW ROCKY EUROPE AND WHY THAT'S (PROBABLY) A GOOD THING

Meet the New Europe, same as the old one.


The great thing about BREXIT are the unforeseen consequences. Nobody can really be sure of what the ultimate outcome of that historic vote by the British people will be. But one result seems to be a revival of inter-European rivalry, something that has both a good and bad side. 

On the plus side it strengthens identity, but on the negative side it might even see a return of military conflict between some European nations. This too is not necessarily a bad thing, as long as the causality count is low. This is because it will stimulate a more masculine and militaristic culture in the various European nations that will have enormous benefits for societies that are incredibly "cucked" and "feminized" at the moment. (Being Alt-Right means being able to take a wider view of things).

The first example of BREXIT leading in this direction is the growing rift between Spain and Britain over Gibraltar, which has now also become mixed up with issues of Scottish and Catalan secession.

THE BREXITING: IT BEGINS...

The Battle for Britain begins.


Nine months after the British establishment got well and truly f**ked up the arse by the British voters, the Brexit baby has finally been born, with Prime Minister Theresa May acting as unwilling midwife.

Yesterday, May finally got round to invoking Article 50, the clause in the Treaty of Lisbon that covers members exiting the EU, which has been compared by some commentators to "The Hotel California"—i.e. you can check in anytime you want but you can never leave, an apt comparison, as music critics believe the song's lyrics refer to being in Hell.

TERRORIST OFFSETTING AND THE SEXIST NATURE OF ANARCHO-TYRANNY

Anglin's attack on Luciana Berger set a
precedent for kicking people off Twitter.
by Colin Liddell
@cbliddell

When it comes to banning people and groups, and shutting down points of view, precedents are important, and so is moral justification. Powerful as the anarcho-tyrannic state governments and corporate social media companies of the West are, they realize that to overuse their power is to lose their power, and so, when they clamp down, they like to grease the wheels with a little moral unguent and emotional manipulation.

BREXIT IN NAME ONLY: NO, YOU *MAY* NOT LIMIT MASS IMMIGRATION



We knew it was a bad deal when a Remainer, Theresa May, was made Prime Minister by the Conservative Party hierarchy, following David Cameron's shock defeat in the famous BREXIT vote. Despite May being a Remainer and being beholden to unseen power brokers, it was still hoped that the will of the people would be respected, especially with regard to the obvious desire to see a drastic reduction in immigration. But no dice!

Heading for the G20 summit in China, May rejected pledges made by the official "Vote Leave" group for a "points-based" system, the best hope in the present political climate for radically reducing immigration.

PODCAST 47: "THE ALT-RIGHT CONQUERS THE UNIVERSE"


Australian film maker and Alt-Right contributor Richard Wolstenscroft joins Andy and Colin to consider the full-spectrum rise of the Alt-Right across the World. Topics discussed include the recent Australian elections, the latest Muslim terrorist attacks in Europe, Black Lives Matter, the War on Police, Britain's new lady Prime Minister, and Donald Trump's coronation as Republican Party candidate.



(Note: due to technical problems, Andy was absent from the second half of the podcast.)

TORY CHAOS MADE SIMPLE


No doubt a lot of people – both in the UK and beyond – are confused by the fast-changing pace of British politics in the wake of the Brexit vote and the resignation of David Cameron, and are scratching their heads at the tumult of twists, turns, and talking points that has reduced the commentariat to a virtual troupe of babbling baboons. Order has to be restored, as well as understanding, so to move things in that direction, here is a lucid and concise precis of the process to choose Britain's next PM.

IDIOT OF THE MONTH: THERESA MAY



Alternative Right's intermittent "Idiot of the Month" award is clearly much coveted in the world of politics. Only this could explain why so many politicians – people normally cleverer than their voters – try so hard to act ridiculous or make the most moronic statements possible. As the prize is a cashless one, with no financial reward, it is heartening to see such competitiveness in pursuit of mere honour, especially when the political class have been fiddling their expenses and taking bribes since as long as anyone can remember.