The question on every normie's lips — What is the Alt-Right? — answered by one of the founders of our movement.


In chronicling the ongoing anti-White, anti-male, anti-heteronormative ideological full-court-press of our judicial, media, and governmental overlords, it is all-too easy to find oneself flogged into a perpetual state of spluttering outrage, or thrust towards a inveterate inclination to indulge in gloomy-doomy prognosticatications.

Such reactions are, in a way, understandable. After all, the campaign afoot to criminalize and/or stigmatize the most innocent, healthy, and normal of human impulses – such as the preference for one's own culture, heritage, or traditions – is indeed an outrageous, obnoxious, and nefarious assault on decency. That said, however, one should take care not avoid the snare of becoming an angry, snarling – but ultimately impotent – curmudgeon, compulsively soaking up the latest ridiculousness, blared luridly from various right-wing scandal sheet tabloids, which record all of these malefactions and atrocities with grinning, almost obscene relish.


Andy Nowicki and Colin Liddell discuss Hillary Clinton's recent speech attacking the Alt-Right and attempting to link us to Donald Trump. Have we really taken over the Republican Party, and are we part of a "vast right-wing conspiracy." involving the likes of David Duke, Nigel Farage, Alex Jones, and a large green frog — all controlled by Vladimir Putin?

What does this say about the state of Hillary's campaign and her mental health? Is she really looking to start WWIII or is she merely trying to reach out to a few cuckservatives and neocons by using Cold War and McCarthyite rhetoric?


Thanks to Hillary Clinton deciding to make war on Donald Trump by linking him to the Alternative Right, implying that the Alternative Right is an ideological enemy so derided that none can survive being linked to it, the Alternative Right is rising in public consciousness.

But what is it? A survey of literature:


The party is over. Hillary has spoken. Here is what she said, with appropriate links and illustrations.
Clintons attacked by giant red pills.

Thank you, Reno! It’s great to be back in Nevada…My original plan for this visit was to focus on our agenda to help small businesses and entrepreneurs. This week we proposed new steps to cut red tape and taxes, and make it easier for small businesses to get the credit they need to grow and hire. Because I believe that in America, if you can dream it, you should be able to build it. We’ll be talking a lot more about our economic plans in the days and weeks ahead.

But today, I want to address something I hear from Americans all over our country. Everywhere I go, people tell me how concerned they are by the divisive rhetoric coming from my opponent in this election. It’s like nothing we’ve heard before from a nominee for President of the United States.


Once it's seen, it can't be unseen.
by Andy Nowicki

Left-liberal attitudes and habits of mind may at one time have been radical, provocative, and gutsy, but today they are staid, stale, conventional, and boring. Any honest contemporary cultural Marxist will have to admit that, politically speaking, his side now holds all significant power. Those who openly decline to subscribe to the ideological establishment's point of view on such matters as race, gender, and sexuality have in effect committed social suicide; having put themselves utterly at the mercy of the powers-that-be, such unfortunates have left themselves open to attack by legions of official Zeitgeist-enforcers and their numerous toadying minions.


Welcome to your new reality, Normies.

by Colin Liddell

How tedious! Apparently Hillary Clinton, in a desperate attempt to deflect attention from her shit health and crap policies, is going to deliver a pus-filled speech attacking the Alt-Right and attempting to link us to Donald Trump. Although the speech will be turgid and full of laughable errors, it will nevertheless be boosted by the flailing energies of the zombie mainstream media, and thus become – albeit temporarily – quite a big deal.

She will probably refer to sites like Breitbart (and its enfant terrible Milo Yiannopoulis) to establish a link to Trump, as well as The Daily Stormer, TRS, and The Daily Shoah, because their hilarious "stormfagging," shorn of its context, humour and irony, provides the "scary racism" that she needs to adorn her narrative.

The speech will bring wider attention to the whole Alt-Right, and as the name-bearer of the movement, our site should see an uptick in concerned or curious "normie" traffic. So, with that in mind here is a quick, dumbed-down guide to the Alt-Right for the uninitiated.

What is the Alt-Right?

Most of you normies probably understand politics through the GOP vs. Democrats or Conservatives vs. Liberal models. That is understandable, as that is all the mainstream media tends to focus on if they can get away with it. The Alt-Right rejects this simple binary form of politics for the following reasons:
(i) It is a false dichotomy
(ii) It ignores the metapolitical dimension
(iii) It embeds false premises in the political debate
Point (i) means that the two parties/political tendencies are not distinct or really opposed. Before Trump (and, to a lesser extent, Bernie Sanders) upset the apple cart, the two parties operated as an effective duopoly.

Slightly flawed meme

Both were essentially open borders, globalist parties, who held that ethnic and racial identitarianism (especially by Whites) was the capital sin. Both were agents of an economic system founded on exporting American debt and importing foreign unemployment. To do this they had to (a) destroy American jobs and (b) increase the public spending deficit to the point where debt creation soared. Both parties cooperated in this endeavour. The GOP enabled US investors to outsource production by lowering American tariffs, while the Dems made it more difficult to do skilled manufacturing at home (welfarism, minimum wage, affirmative action hiring, feminizing the workplace, etc.). The Dems boosted public spending while the GOP cut taxes, etc.

Point (ii) means that politics is not just limited to economics, but also involves cultural and philosophical dimensions. While, economically, the Dems and GOP have worked hand-in-glove on behalf of a poisonous globalism, there are differences between the supporters of the two parties regarding social and moral matters. Unfortunately for social conservatives, the Left entirely dominates the metapolitical realm in America, through its control of Hollywood, the media, and academia. This means that social conservatives have to put up with one Leftist advance after another. US conservatives appear not even to be aware of the metapolitical realm, let alone contest it. Hence they are forever outflanked by the Left.

Point (iii) means that the conventional political discourse accepts un-examined premises – points which are never properly debated because doing so is stigmatized as being evil and "literally Hitler." These premises, many of which are self-evidently false, are therefore "accepted" by both sides. These false premises are enforced by metapolitical means and through the tyranny of political correctness and Leftist control of the media. They include the following:
  • All races are equal and interchangeable
  • Racial difference is only skin deep
  • Equality is a good thing
  • Equalizing outcomes between races is a good thing
  • Diversity is a good thing
  • America is a "proposition nation" (and must accept new members even if they don't agree with the propositions)
  • Men and women should be equal and treated the same in all things
  • Gays and straights should be equal and treated the same in all things
  • Nationalism is bad and leads to wars
  • Globalism is good and leads to peace
  • The Holocaust was uniquely evil and was caused by nationalism
  • Slavery was uniquely evil
  • Segregation is uniquely evil
  • The economy must always grow
  • Religion is a purely private matter
  • Jewish power is not a thing (unless you claim it is)
Etc., etc. While some of these premises are still contended to some degree, the tendency is for them all to be enshrined against attack. You may secretly agree or disagree with these premises, but under the present system just questioning them, means that you will be demonized as "evil." Conservativism, with no metapolitical defences, is thus forced to go along with them. This weakness and deficiency is what called the Alt-Right into being.

Why is the Alt-Right?

As we see above, the Alt-Right is a movement founded on the need to reject the false political dichotomy that favours an increasingly Leftist and globalist world. But why should we be so opposed to this? The reason is quite simple: Leftist globalism is sick and degenerative, both in demographic and economic terms, and any individual or group that deems itself healthy – or which at least values health – must reject it.

Leftist globalism can only exist thanks to modernity and the power of technology. The more technologically backward or economically underprivileged areas are, the more they are forced to resort to traditional, localist, and hierarchical modes of existence, in order to survive. This is why Leftist globalism only exists in the West. But even with all its advantages, Leftist globalism is degenerative. We see this in the West, where the core populations are failing to reproduce and are thus in the process of being replaced by incomers from societies that are more technologically backward and economically underprivileged.

Migrants charging their smartphones
at a railway station in Budapest.
Because of the unexamined premise that "all races are equal and interchangeable," the Left does not see this as a problem, and thinks that the incomers will change and fully assimilate. The irony of course is that if they do, then they will suffer from the same inability to reproduce as the indigenous Westerners they are replacing, leading to a repetition of the cycle.

Ultimately, even by Leftist logic, the West – under Leftist Globalism – will forever be parasitical on non-Western populations to sustain itself.

Economically, Leftist Globalism leads to dysfunctional interdependence and power imbalances. I have already mentioned that America exports debt to countries such as China and Japan, which in return export their unemployment (in the form of manufactured goods) to America. The effect of this is that America has to absorb this unemployment through increasing social dysfunction. This takes the following forms:
  1. racial grievances
  2. high crime and counter crime
  3. mass incarceration
  4. unemployment
  5. inefficiency
  6. fake jobs and professions
  7. prolonged "education"
An interesting case in point is America’s Black population. Up to 1971, when America created the global debt system, by abandoning the gold standard, the country exported more or less what it imported. It had to. The fiat system allowed it to start exporting debt, a negative. But economics has its own karma. To balance this, it also had to import a negative. That was unemployment. This became apparent in the 70s and 80s when Japanese goods started to flood the American market.

But while Asian – and to a lesser extent – European export economies could store American debt conveniently in bank accounts and ledgers, unemployment has to be stored socially – i.e. in the lives of the people. To achieve this America needed to achieve levels of extreme social dysfunction. One means of achieving this was racial grievance – epitomized in the collapse of American cities like Detroit – a process which started to accelerate around this time.

Unemployment storage device.

The growing social alienation of the Black underclass, expressed in the removal of coercion through social discipline (aka Civil Rights and "desegregation"), and resulting in high unemployment and crime, created vast reservoirs of "unemployment storage," both in terms of actual unemployment and mass incarceration, but also in terms of the creation of essentially fake jobs like prison warders, security guards, social workers, legal operatives, etc., that would not be required in a healthy society.

Other forms of unemployment storage were a massive expansion of the educational system, which is basically a nice, pleasant form of unemployment storage for middle class people, and the continuation and expansion of a Cold War military establishment, which can basically be envisaged as unemployment storage for rural and urban White working class people.

The tendency of Leftist Globalism is to increase this system of debt for unemployment resulting in social dysfunction, leading to America becoming an increasingly pampered parasite on a global economy, where the real jobs – and eventually the real power – go elsewhere.

Those in the Alt-Right, to various degrees, realize how the present system multiplies weakness and dysfunction, especially in the West, and, as a healthy response, are motivated to oppose it with a burning and fanatical zeal.

Who is the Alt-Right?


The Alt-Right is both message and medium, both substance and form. 

Those inspired by it gravitate to different aspects of it, and participate with different levels of consciousness and involvement. 

Part of this is because we are a heretical movement, which the establishment fears and attacks. But they never attack us on the level of ideas. Instead we are attacked on the personal, social, and professional level. The Alt-Right is thus divided into the doxxed and the undoxxed, reflecting our opponents' inability to defeat our ideas. 

As medium or form, the Alt-Right has been an aspect of the internet and social media. Many of its operatives have been anonymous individuals – the undoxxed – operating through memes, trolling, shitposting, tweets, and other forms or expression. The attitude is ironic, intuitive, edgy, and shocking.

As message or substance, the Alt-Right is a collection of ideas, moral positions, and insights into the World that, like any ideology, has to justify itself by its inherent tonality and consistency. Here it is tied to a number of thinkers and writers – the doxxed – who are not anonymous, who publish books, have names, and maintain a steady stream of ever-improving content. The attitude is clear, rational, precise, and understated. 

Because of the opposition we face, the Alt-Right has assumed this "bimorphic" nature, existing on dual levels of meaning, truth, and form, but centred around an unassailable ideological core, built on absolute truths. This is a complete inversion of Marxism's own dialectical bimorphism, with a totalitarian world view centred around a core of dialectical uncertainty and lies. 

In contrast to their dead bimorphism, ours generates vitality, fertility, creativity, and energy. It is dialectical in formalistic terms rather than ideological. This also fuels the noticeable infighting in our movement, among those who agree with each other on the deepest aspects.

But it would be wrong to see this as weakness. 

While infighting in static, "unimorphic" movements is a sign of weakness, in a bimorphic movement like our own, it generates a positive energy that constantly renews and improves the movement. This is why our victory is inevitable.

Connected Content:
The Alt-Right Conquers the Universe 
The Intellectual Vacuity of the Old Right
Trump, Hillary, & the Alt Right
1488 is the Gateway Drug to the Alt-Right, not the Other Way Round
The Alt-Right and the Dialectic of "Hyperrealisty"
The Lady from the New York Times
The Role of Trolling

Talkin' Pepe
Racism and Sexism Viewed as Aritotlean Virtues



Scott Walker, or "Harley," as he would have liked to have been called, would seem to be a pretty traditionally Wisconsin guy. His political rise though, was actually only made possible by the decline of traditional Wisconsin.

The official center of Downtown Madison is a pedestrian-only, shopping/dining district called, fittingly, "State Street." It runs for about a mile, and at one end is the State Capitol, while at the other end is UW-Madison, Wisconsin’s flagship university. Locals probably associate the area more with raucous Halloween parties and homeless people than anything else, but State Street is obviously designed to be the symbolic cultural center of the state, physically linking the two great institutional expressions of its people.

It is a nice touch, I think, and it has long been much more than symbolic. Many readers, I am sure, are at least somewhat familiar with "the Wisconsin Idea"—the idea that "the boundaries of the university are the boundaries of the state." This means that the university is to expand the benefits of its knowledge to every citizen of the state.


Alt-Right on her mind. 
Reports are that presidential candidate Hillary Clinton will soon publicly denounce the "alt-right" movement, as well as her opponent Donald Trump's alleged allegiance to this highly unsavory and deeply sinister gang of racists, misogynists, homophobes, anti-Semites, jackals, jackasses, jokers. and anime-porn masturbators.


This is a bit old, but worth noting in retrospect, and well worth a listen: Robert Stark and his guest host Alex von Goldstein engage in an amusing and informative meta-conversation about that most "meta" of memes, Pepe the Frog, and the little green guy's ironic emergence as an alt-right icon.

Stark and Goldstein Talk Pepe on Stark Truth Radio!


One thing that fascinates libtard tourists to South Africa is how Blacks live in shacks in townships next to affluent White areas.

If you tell them that Blacks prefer it that way, then they look at you as if you are stupid. How can any human being want to live in a shack?

I know it sounds strange to libtards, but it is the truth as Lonmin Spokesperson Sue Vey said:
"We have learnt our employees don't want houses. They want to go back to their home countries and province... They choose to live in informal settlements."


From aid to AIDs?

This is a picture of a Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) aid worker, taken at the organization's hospital in Juba, South Sudan. She looks like the typical White, Western, liberal cuck, who postpones having her own kids to instead look after those of an entirely alien people, who are outbreeding us, just so she can morally signal off it and feel somehow important.

The good news, at least for the individual here, is that this photo was taken over two years ago, so there is a fairly good chance that she is no longer in South Sudan right now, from where reports have just emerged of mass gang rapes committed by South Sudanese solders, including rapes of foreign female aid workers. The attacks happened last month, so you may be wondering why the delay in reporting this atrocity? But, of course, we all know the answer to that—negative stereotypes must be stopped at all costs. But back to what actually happened...


"The big tycoons lurk indeed as the ultimate driving force behind world-encompassing Anglo-American imperialism; nothing else. The great money-powers indeed financed the terrifying mass-homicides of the World War. The great money-powers have indeed, as owners of all great newspapers, woven the world into a web of lies. They have with satisfaction whipped up all lower passions, have diligently fostered the growth of present tendencies…" Gottfried Feder
Reading Martin Gilbert’s Churchill and the Jews: A Lifelong Friendship brought to mind that infamous article which Winston Churchill wrote in 1920, for a popular British Sunday newspaper, the Illustrated Sunday Herald, entitled "Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People." Gilbert devotes a small chapter to the essay, provoking me to write my objections to Churchill's very biased argumentation in favour of Zionism.


In an extraordinary piece recently published at the Wall Street Journal, bastion of the contemporary neocon establishment, a veteran conservative "gatekeeper" journalist cuts to the heart of the treasonous spirit of a quintessential modern Western (mis)ruler.

Although she never uses the term "ethnomasochist," writer Peggy Noonan essentially summons up the concept in discussing the motivations behind the disastrous "open door" migrant policy pursued by German Chancellor Angela Merkel.


The rise of Donald Trump is a good excuse to discover or rediscover one his most intelligent supporters, himself a former candidate for Republican leadership, Pat Buchanan. He has now become an unapologetic cheerleader of Donald Trump, defending with arguments and brains what Trump is yelling with a populist tone, thus giving an intellectual stature to the one the media portray as Donald Dumb.

It is always hard to pinpoint the best text to read and analyze when trying to understand someone who has written a dozen books and countless articles. The choice is subjective and might be misleading, but the New York Times bestseller The Death of the West sparked my interest. How could a book with such a Spenglerian title become so popular? And how could a book said to be that politically incorrect get such high rankings and recognition? I then decided that this would be the book I would read to better understand the American politician so often quoted by Guillaume Faye and other New Rightists.


Here in the UK, the BBC so much want to focus on the Rio Olympics and how Britain's team, with its strategically placed selection of well-adjusted non-Whites, is getting on with the important business of giving the post-Brexit nation the right gleam of international openness. However, instead of this they are forced to interrupt coverage of the multicultural "mytopia" to report on that ominous presence across the Atlantic, Donald J. Trump.


The globalist left keep telling us that "diversity is our strength™" and that we can only have it through a ridiculous policy of open borders, mass immigration, political correctness, and race mixing. Predictably enough the Rio Olympics and the largely miscegentaed nature of the host nation is being pressed into service in selling this message, but to see its validity, just keep an eye on the medal table. Usually host nations do particularly well. China won in 2008 and the UK was third in 2012. But don't expect to see Brazil emulate any of that.


DiGeorgio: That's one thing about our Harry. He doesn't play any favorites, Harry hates everybody: Limeys, Micks, Hebes, fat dagos, niggers, honkies, chinks. You name it.
Chico: How's he feel about Mexicans?
DiGeorgio: Ask him.
Harry: Especially Spics.
(Harry winks at Digeorgio as he walks off).
Dirty Harry (1971)
Slavoj Zizek has repeatedly made the seemingly contradictory point that Leftists should adopt "progressive racism" in order to counter racism. This would involve telling racist jokes that would produce "solidarity" by a communal sharing in obscenity. The joke and the laughter would effectively function as an assuaging mechanism to mask the very real and prescient tribal instincts, especially of whites whose countries are being invaded by a waves of foreign competitors.


Published at the time of the 2012 Olympics. Republished here to coincide with the opening of the Rio Olympics.

by Colin Liddell

Here in the UK the London Olympic Games have been considered a great success. After two weeks of competition, the British Olympic team has won an astounding 29 gold medals and has finished third in the medals table, above the mighty Russians and below only the USA and China. One of the most mentioned facts in recent days is the single gold medal we won at the 1996 Olympics. On the naïve level of simple, uncomplicated sporting enthusiasm it has been a resounding success, and an easy sell to the sporting inclinations of the UK public.

But looking at the bigger picture, the hidden agendas, and the crunched numbers, a different picture starts to emerge; one that suggests Britain’s Olympic success is merely the phosphorescent glow of an entity walking in death’s shadow.


Originally published at Caste Football in 2008, and republished to coincide with the Rio Olympics.

Some countries will do anything to get an Olympic medal. Georgia, for example, went to the trouble of recruiting both its men and women’s beach volleyball teams from players rejected from Brazil’s national team. This meant that players who spoke no Georgian, knew almost nothing about the country, and had only visited it once or twice, briefly, competed under its banner. Luckily, justice was done and both teams failed to get a medal.

Georgia’s neighbour Turkey was more successful. It got a couple of silver medals from the Ethiopian long distance runner Elvan Abeylegesse. Compared to the ‘Georgians,’ at least Abeylegesse had lived in the country for a few years and had also married but then divorced a Turkish national. Still, the reason she finished second in the 5,000 and 10,000-meter races wasn’t because she was Turkish. Despite what it said on her passport or vest, she was still biologically benefiting from having the lightweight frame and high red blood cell count of an Ethiopian.


The internet, which is now a social interaction, like all social interactions, distills complex ideas down to the viewpoint of the herd: we fear this, we do not fear that.

As a result, on the Right there is often talk about “Zionism” as being a horrible evil which intends to take over the world, forgetting that Zionism is an assertion of Nationalism—the idea that Jews need their own state, and all Jews belong there, where they can control their destiny and live according to their ways.


"I paid my money to the Clinton Foundation. You owe me the presidency. We had a deal, lady."

The US election has now entered its final stage, the battle between Trump and Hillary. Thanks to the insurgent nature of Trump's campaign, we are now in unfamiliar territory. We have never had anything quite like this before. For this reason, it is extremely difficult to say how things will pan out and who will win. Looked at one way, it must be Trump, but, looked at from another angle, suddenly Hillary looks certain to be installed as President by the powerful forces backing—and presumably controlling—her (right now cooked polls are putting her seven points ahead). In short, the overall picture is confusing.