GLOBALIST NARRATIVE COLLAPSES AS FORCED DIVERSITY BY IMMIGRATION IMPLODES

Juncker: going two ways at once

by Brett Stevens

Europe finds itself in crisis again mainly because Europe has always been in crisis since they killed off the kings and brought in republics. It turns out that internal division and perpetual struggle for power do not provide stability, but the opposite, like a drunk person with mood swings trying to navigate an amusement park haunted house.

WHY GUN CONTROL ADVOCATES ALWAYS MISFIRE

Andy Nowicki offers "gun control" liberals some sincere constructive criticism, which he doubts they will take, though they should.

ARE WE RIGHT? (PART I)

by James Lawrence

Long before choosing to involve myself in the Alt-Right in 2012, I used to lurk around the fragmentary dissident Rightist scene as a passive observer, red-pilling myself on various topics. From that time back in the early 2000s up to the present day, as the range of official thought has narrowed and dissent has expanded, I have watched one truth go from a pessimistic suspicion to an article of faith among the awakened. It is this: the so-called “mainstream Right” is not a secret sympathiser or potential ally, but a deadly enemy that loathes us just as much as the Left.

The “free competition of Left and Right” in the “democratic public sphere” is a sham. “Conservative” politicians – those who are not outright imposters – are essentially client rulers, allotted some political power in return for pacifying and misdirecting our people, true advocacy for that people’s interests being forbidden. Disturbing as this may be, accepting it meant that dissidents no longer had to cut themselves loose from all ideological tradition by framing themselves as “beyond Left and Right”. The modern Left was indeed the same force that had bathed humanity in blood under the guise of Communism; the Right, properly understood, was the antithesis to this force; but the “mainstream Right” known to the general public was a kept eunuch of the enemy.

AGAINST THE "ANTI-FASCIST" CREEPS

A Review of Alexander Reid-Ross’s “Against the Fascist Creep”

by Keith Preston

For decades, a minor cottage industry of professional “anti-racists” and “anti-fascists” has existed for the purpose of perpetually sounding the alarm about the imminent threat posed by supposed “far right extremists.” The most well-known and influential of these is the Southern Poverty Law Center, which has raked in millions of dollars largely by frightening elderly liberals and Jews old enough to remember the Holocaust with hobgoblin tales about the supposedly persistent rise of neo-Nazism in America.

THE FIRST BLAST OF THE TRUMPET AGAINST THE MONSTRUOUS REGIMENT OF BLUE HAIRED FREAKS

The Semantics of Dyed Blue Hair
in the Modern West

by Colin Liddell

"For who can denie but it repugneth to nature, that the blind shal be appointed to leade and conduct such as do see? That the weake, the sicke, and impotent persones shall norishe and kepe the hole and strong, and finallie, that the foolishe, madde and phrenetike shal gouerne the discrete, and giue counsel to such as be sober of mind?" John Knox

I could not resist re-purposing the title of John Knox's 16th-century diatribe against female rulers for another contemporary issue, but actually there have already been quite a few toots on the horn against the legions of blue-haired harpies that seem to be a fixture on the SJW Left. In 2015, a rather good article at Breitbart came up with the word "aposematism" to explain the phenomenon:

LEFTISM IS REALITY DENIAL

The Left in one of its more open-minded moods.

by Brett Stevens

Very few people make it through the thought required to analyze Leftism to its roots. On the surface, we all know what it is: an outlook of supposed compassion which supports feminism, diversity, social welfare programs, and gay rights.

Underneath the surface, Leftism reveals itself as fundamentally an "ideology," or in other words a notion that human preferences for how the world "should be" are more important than how the world actually functions. This was formalized in The Enlightenment™ as the idea of "seeing the world through human reason" as expressed in the individual.

THE RETURN OF DADDY

by Brett Stevens

A cultural shift is occurring across the West: people are moving away from ideology, or the ideal of what "should be"—based on concerns for socializing with others—toward results-based thinking that emphasizes actual production and civilizational stability.

EQUALITY HAS CONSEQUENCES

The Consequences of Equality
by Matthew S. Battaglioli
106 pages
Buy at Amazon.com

Reviewed by Keith Preston

For the political Left, there is no value that is more important than “universal human equality.” To be against equality is to be reactionary, regressive, benighted, bigoted, unenlightened, unseemly, and anti-human. And while previous generations of leftists were concerned primarily with legal equality, and then economic equality, today’s leftists demand equality in every sphere of human activity. Every profession must have an exact proportion of males and females (“gender parity”). Every institution must have an equitable proportion of ethnic groups. Any statistical disparity among races, genders, ages, sexual orientations, or classes is thought to be the result of mere oppression, exploitation or greed on the part of those who seem to have a leg up in life. Hence, the popularity of “privilege theory” among fashionable social justice warriors who equate the fact of having been born straight, white, male, “cisgendered” or some combination of these to be the equivalent of original sin.

BABYKILLERS AND BASTARD FACTORIES

by Henry Dampier

There are a couple female life patterns that feed contemporary leftism in the West: that of the babykiller and the bastard factory. The babykiller lifestyle tends to be for more up-market women, whereas the bastard factory lifestyle is for the poorer and usually (marginally) more religious demographic.

Babykillers, we’re all familiar with, perhaps intimately so. They get their first birth control prescription when they’re maybe around 14, perhaps a little older — whenever their parents start to become nervous about what their daughter is up to. The usual euphemism is that it’ll help her control her acne.

REMEMBER THIS GUY?

by Stephen Amico

Remember this guy? Sure you do, look closer. We went to college with this guy.

Yes, that's right. The one who drove that old station wagon and was always talking about the rights of the poor, even though everyone knew his parents were loaded.

MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR., HERO OF THE SUBURBS

by Brett Stevens

Why would anyone ever say, especially in a pained voice, “Can’t we all just get along?”

All of us getting along means acceptance of whatever. It means that there is no evolution, no searching for a better answer. In practice, it means that we all retreat to our homes and ignore each other as well as ignoring what happens to our society. If it gets worse, that is not our fault.

People who ask why we cannot all get along are seeking this kind of bourgeois individualism. They want the freedom to ignore the consequences of their actions and their inaction, so that if they contribute to mass destruction of society, they can look back and say “But I was fair to everyone, and I guaranteed that we all had rights.” Yes, rights to ignore that our fate is bound together and that what determines this is not the freedom of individuals, but the health of societies.