OBAMA AND THE IRONY OF THE RE-IMPOSITION OF SLAVERY BY A BLACK MAN

Libya, the World centre of neo-slavery

by Colin Liddell

It took the White race to finally eradicate the age-old institution of slavery from the World. Yes, we may have participated in it to some degree, and, yes, slavery may even have been superior—or at least more humane—than several other systems of labour exploitation that dominated the historical masses of the world. But there was always a strong element of individual degradation that sat uneasily with the White soul, so it fell to our great race to be the one to stamp it out.

OBAMA ARTIST'S RACIAL AND AESTHETIC INFERIORITY COMPLEX

‏by Colin Liddell

@NewAltRight

People seem to be misunderstanding the earlier work of Kehinde Wiley, the artist chosen to paint ex-President Obama's official portrait. These earlier paintings show Black women beheading White women (see above). Many are seeing these works as evidence of anti-White race hatred. Although that's clearly there, there are also other elements, some of which are quite surprising.

AMERICA FIRST

by Andy Nowicki

Unlike most on the Alt-Right, I have mostly been Trump-skeptical in orientation and outlook. I was glad that he won, of course, but that was really just because him winning meant that his opponent, that screechy horrid harpy from Hell, lost. Thus I don't approach this analysis as a sycophant or even a particular admirer of the newly-coronated God Emperor, on whose distinctive orange mop the crown now securely rests.

Still, even I have to admit that the Inauguration speech I just heard was quite an extraordinary one. A brazen, brass-balled, taboo-shattering peroration indeed. Though brief, it packed a mighty punch. Though not exactly eloquent (has the Donald ever been so, even with a prepared script?), it nevertheless retained a brusquely bracing brio. It danced to the rhetorical edge, and then thrillingly leaped over the edge, of what polite people  (much less newly-inaugurated presidents!) are supposed to be allowed to say in our benighted age which so arrogantly presumes its own righteousness.

OBAMA ANNOUNCES THE ADOPTION OF A NEW NATIONAL ANTHEM (APRIL 1 ENCORE)

Prez issues edict mandating a new national anthem

by Andy Nowicki

In a stunning announcement sure to spark controversy, President Obama announced Friday that he has issued an executive order that the United States will adopt a new national anthem.

"The time has come," the president intoned solemnly, as he spoke to the assembled DC press corps on the eve of the Forth of July weekend. "Change is never easy, but sometimes it is necessary," he added.

The new song, Obama indicated, would replace Francis Scott Key's Star Spangled Banner, written in commemoration of the valor of American troops in their defense of  Fort McHenry during the War of 1812. The Banner had been a patriotic favorite for many decades, prior to being officially recognized as the official national anthem of the United States by President Woodrow Wilson in 1916.

MAD AS HELL

Most of us around these parts of the intertubes would agree that Fox News is little but controlled opposition (i.e., GOP-funded shills and hacks pimping for the establishment lite-right), but I'd say it still has its moments. One of those moments transpired last week when the brainiest of the network's obligatory blonde babe anchors, Megyn Kelly, got a bee in her bonnet over the murder of Kate Steinle by an illegal immigrant who had been given "sanctuary" status in San Francisco.

OBAMA ANNOUNCES THE ADOPTION OF A NEW NATIONAL ANTHEM

Independence weekend surprise: Prez issues edict mandating a new national anthem

by Andy Nowicki

In a stunning announcement sure to spark controversy, President Obama announced Friday that he has issued an executive order that the United States will adopt a new national anthem.

"The time has come," the president intoned solemnly, as he spoke to the assembled DC press corps on the eve of the Forth of July weekend. "Change is never easy, but sometimes it is necessary," he added.

The new song, Obama indicated, would replace Francis Scott Key's Star Spangled Banner, written in commemoration of the valor of American troops in their defense of  Fort McHenry during the War of 1812. The Banner had been a patriotic favorite for many decades, prior to being officially recognized as the official national anthem of the United States by President Woodrow Wilson in 1916.

ANGRY WHITE MALE

by Alex Fontana

The facts about Dylann "Storm(front)" Roof speak for themselves:

At twenty-one years old, introverted, withdrawn, a loner and a drug user, looking like an emaciated Macaulay Culkin, Roof had exhibited deviant social behaviour and was twice arrested, once for trespassing and once for a drug charge (Buprenorphine was the drug listed in some accounts). Roof came from a broken family; he was unemployed, and probably from a low-socioeconomic background. He seemed to lack a proper support network and social circle – which caused him to feel isolated, hopeless, lonely, frustrated, and daunted by an uncertain future.

From the testimony of friends and survivors of his homicidal "lashing out" at an AME Church in Charleston, South Carolina, and from other sources of information – including photographs of him wearing apartheid era patches – Roof apparently espoused ‘white supremacist ideology.’ Reportedly he told one of the survivors, “I have to do it. You rape our women and you’re taking over the country.”

THE CHOOM GANG IN THE WHITE HOUSE

by Brett Stevens

Jonathan Gruber triggered a political tempest when videos surfaced of him admitting, nay, bragging, that he and his comrades not only deceived voters, but manipulated them by using key terms to mislead and then delivered something else entirely.

Whether or not Gruber’s actions are evil, acceptable or merely predictable, he raised an interesting point for the American voters: would you elect yourself to the position of voter? After all, it seems like every year confidence in government falls and yet the voters keep consistently electing bad leaders.

As they say in the hills, fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me. It turns out the Barack Hussein Obama presidency has brought unprecedented levels of corruption, failure and reduced national prestige, but voters seemingly excited about his half-African origins and strong liberal credentials voted him into office twice. Is it time for the voters to step down?

THE OPIUM OF THE WEST

President Obama outlines his geopolitical vision in an appropriate setting.

by James Harmon

The reality of Russian-American relations is that America has simply bitten off more than it can chew. Whatever criticisms of the Russian president, one simply cannot fault his seizing on the failures of his opponents – like a wolf striking at the neck of a distracted deer.

Strong, decisive and measured, he has systematically shown the West to be foolish, impatient and wobbly; and standing up to Obama is easier in virtually every way, when the idealistic former Western socialist (Obama belonged to a socialist party in his youth) meets a man who actually lived and worked under socialism, and who is no idealistic daydreamer.

IT'S ON WHITES AND MEN ONLY

The Left and Collective Responsibility

by Bay Area Guy

One of the more sophisticated arguments leftists employ in order to morally browbeat “privileged” groups into embracing their agenda is the notion that “silence is consent.” Famous black civil rights activist Martin Luther King on several occasions made statements to the effect that those who remain neutral during times of conflict and oppression have chosen the side of the oppressor. In one of his classic works “Letter From a Birmingham Jail,” King does not mince words when denouncing white moderates who were insufficiently devoted to the cause of black freedom:

“I must make two honest confessions to you, my Christian and Jewish brothers. First, I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: “I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action”; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a “more convenient season.” Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.”

WHY WE NEED HILLARY TO WIN: THE FIRE RISES

Buy a vowel?

by Jan Stadler

Given the endless coverage by FOX news and Bill O’Reilly of poll after poll after speculation with Charles Krauthammer over whether Hillary can win, will Hillary run and can Rand Paul beat Hillary, I am going to assume the 2016 election has already begun.

Of course in line with this excessively premature hysteria about Hillary Clinton, conservatives, libertarians, populists, Tea Partiers and Christian fundamentalists are all in a twit over the future prospects of Hilary Clinton become the next president of these states united.

LOOKING FOR A "BERLIN 1945 MOMENT" FOR LIBERALISM

by Brett Stevens

Hegel thinks human culture finds new ideas through dialectic synthesis; in my experience, the process takes a simpler form. We aggregate everything that has worked in the recent term, then drop out whatever we’re afraid of, and push the result onto the next generation. But we stop and re-assess any time a true apocalyptic tragedy strikes.

Such an event happened in Berlin in the year 1945. The Third Reich managed to unite most of the industrial nations of the West against it and went down in flames, buried in Russian bodies and Anglo-American firepower. As the flags came down and the occupation began, history it seemed sent up a signal: nothing further in this direction, turn back now.

THE CABLE OF CRITIQUE: WHY CABLE NEWS IS DYING

by Colin Liddell

If not a hard on, I've got at least a soft spot for Rachel Maddow.

Ever since she picked up on my article Holocaust Amnesia Day, and propelled it to undying international fame sometime last year, I've suspected that our destinies may be conjoined in some dark and intimate way. There is definitely a certain synergy between Ms. Maddow's show and the Alternative Right.

I guess we need repellent Liberals like her on the mainstream media to stampede decent people towards us and break the yellow tape that has been strung around our deeply taboo views; while she and her ilk need us to practice their two main skills of pointing and sputtering. In view of her perfectly legitimate sexual preferences and practices, you could even say that we need each other as much as dykes need dildos.

THE OBAMA POWER SHOT

"Okay, I'll accept the charges"

by Colin Liddell

With the unfolding situation in the Crimea, we have now passed beyond polite diplomacy to the point of power projection. In nature this is equivalent to the moment when two alpha males cross each other's paths and start to square up. In those first few moments how each animal displays his power and confidence may be key to deciding the fight.

In the realm of international geopolitics, this projection naturally takes place through the media with the release of carefully worded statements and equally carefully selected imagery.

WHAT WILL RUSSIA DO?

An interview with Alexander Dugin on the Syrian crisis.

by Manuel Ochsenreiter

Prof. Dugin, the world faces right now in Syria the biggest international crisis since the downfall of the Eastern Block in 1989/90. Washington and Moscow find themselves in a proxy-confrontation on the Syrian battleground. Is this a new situation?

Dugin: We have to see the struggle for geopolitical power as the old conflict of land power represented by Russia and sea power represented by the USA and its NATO partners. This is not a new phenomenon; it is the continuation of the old geopolitical and geostrategic struggle. The 1990s was the time of the great defeat of the land power represented by the USSR. Mikhail Gorbachev refused the continuation of this struggle. This was a kind of treason and resignation in front of the unipolar world. But with President Vladimir Putin in the early years of this decade, came a reactivation of the geopolitical identity of Russia as a land power. This was the beginning of a new kind of competition between sea power and land power.

OBAMA: UNWITTING SAVIOUR OF WHITE AMERICA

The classic moronic gurn of the habitual teleprompter addict.

by Colin Liddell

It is often remarked that Communism did the White race a major favour, helping to preserve it in its Eastern homelands, and that since its fall in 1989, those areas have become subjected to the same destructive tides of feminism, low-birth rates, and multiculturalism that have overwhelmed the West. At the same time we are supposed to be saddened that America has just returned an essentially Communist president. Is there not perhaps something of a paradox here?

THE CHANGING FACE OF DEMOCRACY

by Colin Liddell

This year sees America engaged in a titanic political struggle between two radically different systems.

You already know that I am not referring to the policy differences of the Republican and Democrat parties, which are microscopic at best. Nor is the contest between the differing outlooks of the candidates, as both of them view the world from the same tiny, myopic eye. No. The real contest will centre on the methods used to secure a majority of those who can be bothered to vote. What makes this doubly interesting is that what is happening in America is not just confined to the States, but can also be detected in other political systems in the so-called 'advanced democracies' of the World.

STABBED IN THE BACK?

Trying to poz Bibi's Negev hole?

by Colin Liddell

What’s Super Autocue-reading Boy up to this time? A couple of weeks after unleashing his “Seals of Death” against the Bearded-but-almost-forgotten One, which was one week after unleashing his recently re-remembered Hawaiian birth chit, he now comes out, 1960s-Batman-style, with a new, shiny, Middle-Eastern peace plan that looks set to upset the Jewish lobby—Biff!Zap!Bam! Kapow!

Is this more evidence of the “chaos theory” that Igor Shishkin says lies at the heart of American foreign policy? The simple, low maintenance theory for all this is that Obama is simply making pointless “feel good” sound bites, with those pulling his strings knowing full well that a reversion to Israel’s pre-1967 borders has as much chance as a snowball in the Negev (85 percent of which is used by the Israeli military for training purpose). May as well send a train down a track without any sleepers.

A slightly more abstruse theory is that the White House’s “Big Idea” at the moment is to place itself at the forefront of the Arab Spring, even though this might deprive the Democrats of some of the more naïve shekels.

PAPER TIGER

by Colin Liddell

Following last year's multiple sex scandal, Tiger Woods has now finally come out and apologized in what looked like a heavily scripted and intensely rehearsed performance before a select audience of sympathetic friends and media for the benefit of his corporate advertising profile. After all that has happened, it will certainly be an uphill struggle to re-launch the golfer's shattered career and image, and save his marriage.

While the lurid details of this scandal have held a fleeting interest for the general public, this case is worthy of more serious consideration because it reveals a great deal about the shortcomings and contradictions of the multicultural globalism that we are opposed to.