Showing posts with label Alt-Right. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Alt-Right. Show all posts

ARE WE RIGHT? (PART III)

 This is the concluding part of a three-part article. Go to Part I. Go to Part II.


It is time to deliver on the promise of this essay – which is, of course, an answer to the great question contained in its title. Can our movement honestly lay claim to the Rightist tradition of the West, which in turn leads back to the roots of our civilisation? Or do we represent a shallow, transitory and chimerical reaction of older Leftist ideas, like nationalism, against newer ones like multiculturalism?

In short, can the Alt-Right really call itself the True Right?

ARE WE RIGHT? (PART I)


Long before choosing to involve myself in the Alt-Right in 2012, I used to lurk around the fragmentary dissident Rightist scene as a passive observer, red-pilling myself on various topics. From that time back in the early 2000s up to the present day, as the range of official thought has narrowed and dissent has expanded, I have watched one truth go from a pessimistic suspicion to an article of faith among the awakened. It is this: the so-called “mainstream Right” is not a secret sympathiser or potential ally, but a deadly enemy that loathes us just as much as the Left.

The “free competition of Left and Right” in the “democratic public sphere” is a sham. “Conservative” politicians – those who are not outright imposters – are essentially client rulers, allotted some political power in return for pacifying and misdirecting our people, true advocacy for that people’s interests being forbidden. Disturbing as this may be, accepting it meant that dissidents no longer had to cut themselves loose from all ideological tradition by framing themselves as “beyond Left and Right”. The modern Left was indeed the same force that had bathed humanity in blood under the guise of Communism; the Right, properly understood, was the antithesis to this force; but the “mainstream Right” known to the general public was a kept eunuch of the enemy.

CULTURISM, RACISM, CIVIC AND WHITE NATIONALISM



Culturists are often accused of turning a blind eye to race. So, how does acknowledging racial differences, such as IQ, impact culturist policy?

Watch this video for the answer!

ALT-RIGHT DRAMA TRAUMA (NAMELESS PODCAST)


Is it possible to comment upon the "movement" Sturm und Drang taking place lately, without mentioning any names or (overtly) taking any sides? In his latest "Nameless" Podcast, Andy Nowicki does his best. Topics include the perils of knee-jerk trolling and alpha male "beta-baiting."

ALT-RIGHT ECLIPSE ALT-LITE IN WASHINGTON DEMOS



The Alt-Lite have proved adept at getting clicks, but online clicks, it seems, are quite a different thing to actual boots on the ground and fists in the air. 

This was evident in Washington yesterday as the Alt-Right and Alt-Lite went head-to-head in rival demos.

Unfortunately for the Alt-Lite, mild interest in an online clickbaity item about a piece of low-hanging fruit (Moooslims, SJWs, etc.) is not the same thing as people getting fired up enough to come out and march for a cause. So, numerically, it was a big win for the Alt-Right, who drew over 300 supporters to the 20 or 30 of their rivals. 

To get people to actually show up you need something a bit more positive and passionate than the negative Alt-Lite values of "muh freedoms" and "Where's my dildo?" It was no surprise, therefore, that they got their arses handed to them in a bucket in Washington.

Originally the demos were supposed to be united, but then members of the Alt-Lite, including Mike Cernovich and Jack Posobiec, thinking they were as big as their Twitter followings decided to counter-signal the Alt-Right as "racist" and "anti-Semitic" and make their own demo.

While the Alt-Right demo, featuring Richard Spencer, Nathan Damigo, Mike Enoch, Baked Alaska, and others, attracted over 300 supporters, the Alt-Lite demo struggled to get a few dozen at most.

The reason for this is because the Alt-Right actually believes in something positive—identitarianism for a group long denied it, and at a time when the lights of Western European civilization are going out all over the world.

The Alt-Lite by contrast just believes in atomized freedoms, and therefore is part of the process of decay that spawns egoism and apathy. And while that works with low-threshold Twitter followers looking for a bit of bait to click, the downside of it is that you are not likely to mobilize much of a showing IRL. The demos in Washington amply demonstrate that.

Hail victory!

AN OUTLINE OF CULTURIST POLICY (PART FOUR):CULTURIST PROFILING


Introduction

Our police, airports, employers, anti-terror units and immigration officers need to engage in culturist profiling.  But, they cannot do so because multiculturalists have convinced America that discussing negative aspects of cultural diversity is ‘racist.’ While race may increase predispositions to certain behaviors, culture regulates their expression.  For example, as black two–parent families have been ruined by the welfare state, the black crime rate has risen enormously.

AN OUTLINE OF CULTURIST POLICY: PART THREE


The 3rd of 8 WEEKLY OUTLINES OF CULTURIST POLICY


Culturism (cǔl-chər-ǐz-əm) n. The use of philosophy, art, governance policy and science to honor, promote, manage and protect traditional majority cultures. 
Culturist (cǔl-chər-ǐst) n. 1. An advocate of culturism. 2. One who engages in the philosophy, arts, policy creation and sciences that promote, protect and manage traditional majority cultures. 3. Adj. Of or pertaining to culturism, culturists or culturist policy.

--------
This is the third of a weekly, 8-part review of culturist policies. The series will become a short e-book. Any feedback you could provide in terms of ideas or presentation would be appreciated.
--------

Absolute Culturist, Pragmatic Culturist, & Racist Repatriation

There are three approaches to repatriation: ‘racist,’ 'absolute culturist,' and 'pragmatic culturist.' Both absolute and pragmatic culturists would immediately stop all Islamic immigration to the West, but differ on repatriation policy.

Racist repatriation policy

‘Racist repatriation’ policy gets mentioned only to highlight its vast difference from both forms of culturist repatriation.

Racist repatriation would remove all non-white people from Western nations. Such a policy would never be approved via election. And, in a multi-ethnic nation like the United States, especially given the fact that much of our military and police force are not white, attempts to implement this policy could lead to society violently collapsing.

Absolute culturist repatriation policy

‘Absolute culturists’ want the immediate repatriation of all Muslims back to their countries of origin.

Note how much subtler absolute culturist repatriation is than racist repatriation. It does not cast Hindus, Asians, Mexican and all Africans into the same net. It makes subtle distinctions based on history and belief systems: it is culturist, not racist.

However, absolute culturist repatriation suffers from the same potential for civil unrest as the racist repatriation position.

Furthermore, and importantly, the rule of law is central to western identity. If we violate the rights of citizens, we undermine order in society.

However, absolute culturist repatriation policy would have the benefit of quickly ending the threat of Jihad in the West.

Pragmatic culturist repatriation policy

Instead of the ‘absolute culturist’ repatriation policy of deporting all Muslims, ‘pragmatic repatriation policy’ would review Muslims’ naturalization.

In the U.S. naturalization proceedings, the potential new citizen swears, "that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic." Furthermore, they "absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty."

Naturalized citizens who have supported ISIS or Al Qaeda have committed fraud, rendering their naturalization null and void, justifying their repatriation.

Furthermore, any naturalized citizens who donated to or actively participated in a mosque that promotes Sharia or any other anti-Western values, (FGM or hijabs or polygamy, for example) may merit repatriation.

Such a policy targets hostile Muslims while protecting the rights of those willing to assimilate.

Such pragmatic repatriation programs, (in conjunction with ending the foreign funding of mosques and culturist school curriculum – discussed elsewhere), can minimize the risk of Jihad without absolute culturist repatriation’s rights violations or potential violence.

Conclusion

Stopping Islamic immigration does not violate anyone’s constitutional rights.  Our Constitution applies to US citizens, not foreigners.

Domestically, repatriation laws can pass Constitutional scrutiny in two ways: (1) by remembering it is the separation of Church and State, not Mosque and State, (2) by classifying Islam as a political ideology.

Ultimately, culturism means officially recognizing our traditional majority culture, its legal standing and the State’s interest in protecting it.  Leaving multiculturalism for culturism will rationally justify culturist immigration and repatriation laws.

Circumstances seem to be swaying culturists from being ‘pragmatic’ to being ‘absolute.’  But, those moving in this direction must consider the violence this could entail, and so should not do so lightly.

------
Click to read the policy series intro or part two (culturist rights).
You can read more about culturism here.

AN OUTLINE OF CULTURIST POLICY: PART TWO


The 2nd of 8 WEEKLY OUTLINES OF CULTURIST POLICY


Culturism (cǔl-chər-ǐz-əm) n. The use of philosophy, art, governance policy and science to honor, promote, manage and protect traditional majority cultures. 
Culturist (cǔl-chər-ǐst) n. 1. An advocate of culturism. 2. One who engages in the philosophy, arts, policy creation and sciences that promote, protect and manage traditional majority cultures. 3. Adj. Of or pertaining to culturism, culturists or culturist policy.
--------
This is the second of a weekly, 8-part review of culturist policies. The series will become a short e-book. Any feedback you could provide in terms of ideas or presentation would be appreciated.

Culturist Epistemology

Culture is not metaphysical; ultimately, it exists in heads and institutions.  You need land to grow food in order to support the heads in which culture exists.  With no food, no heads; with no heads, no culture.  When a Muslim immigrates, the very space he occupies is a Muslim space.  When your town has a Hindu temple, that space is necessarily no longer a Western space. No ‘western essence’ permeates Muslim no-go zones; that space is no longer western.
Defensive Culturist Word Use

If the West falls, neither China nor Iran will promote ‘human rights;’ ‘human rights’ will cease to exist. To protect so - called ‘human rights’ we must protect western territory and solvency.

Accordingly, it is best to call so-called ‘human rights,’ ‘western rights.’  This will remind us that when we defend the West we defend the only culture that promotes rights.  That’s why, truly, western culturism is the new liberalism.

Offensive Culturist Word Use

Cultural diversity being real dooms attempts to militarily force Muslim nations to adopt Western values and institutions.  Therefore, (when not punishing them for terrorist acts), culturism advocates keeping our military out of Muslim nations.

But, verbally, we can weaken Muslim governments by degrading their values in comparison with the ‘western rights’ model.  For example, we should ruthlessly mock Iran’s theocratic government and backwards women’s rights agenda.

Yet, Iran is not our concern.  Reifying western pride and identity is the real goal of mocking Islam’s overall stupid brutality.  Cultural identity is usually bolstered via contrast with a hated other.  Islam is, particularly, suited to make the West look distinct and noble.

While culturism involves battles for land, might and economies that can sustain heads, ultimately culturists must battle for the cultural assumptions in those heads.

Culturist rights and refugees

We often hear that ‘individual rights’ trump ‘culturist rights;’ That is, if we enforce our immigration laws, a teen and her illegal mother might be separated. Individual rights do not automatically trump the West’s culturist right to have a border.

Muslim nations don't take in Christian refugees. China takes no refugees. Just like the Asian and Muslim realms, the West has culturist rights.  So-called, ‘human rights’ do not trump the West’s culturist right to sovereignty.

The culturist programming of youth is not difficult. Changing adult’s views is nearly impossible. Culture is made up of populations who identify with it.  Rejecting the millions of incoming ‘refugees,’ because they harbor hostile ideology, is a defensible policy position.

All Muslim ‘refugees’ must be preemptively directed to a nation state in the Islamic world.

End foreign mosque funding

The foreign funding of mosques in the West must be stopped. To do this, philosophically, we must reject multiculturalism and embrace the culturist idea that the West has a unique civilization to protect and that Islam is the West’s traditional enemy.
To make this legal, we can note that the separation of Church and State says nothing of Mosque and State.

More realistically, in America, the Foreign Agent Registration Act allows us to register foreign agents’ and stop their funds from being used for domestic propaganda.  To apply this law, we must classify Islam as the political ideology of an enemy, which it is.

Ending the foreign funding of mosques does not prohibit local citizens from funding and building their own mosques.

Western rights belong to westerners individually and collectively: our Constitutional guarantee of free speech does not grant Saudi Arabia the right to build mosques in the West.  Our not being able to build churches in Saudi Arabia confirms that ‘culturist rights’ do exist.

Conclusion

China’s racist immigration laws protect their national identity.  Saudi Arabia’s culturist immigration laws protect theirs.  The West is not a culturally neutral ‘human’ globalist space.  The West has a specific culture and the right to have culturist laws that protect our culture.

The phrase ‘human rights’ is most frequently used in order to corrode western sovereignty. To win the rhetorical battle we must correctly call so-called, ‘human rights’ what they are: ‘western rights.’

----
You can read the culturist policy series intro here.
You can read more about culturism here.

AN OUTLINE OF CULTURIST POLICY: PART ONE


The 1st of 8 WEEKLY OUTLINES OF CULTURIST POLICY

Culturism (cǔl-chər-ǐz-əm) n. The use of philosophy, art, governance policy and science to honor, promote, manage and protect traditional majority cultures.
Culturist (cǔl-chər-ǐst) n. 1. An advocate of culturism. 2. One who engages in the philosophy, arts, policy creation and sciences that promote, protect and manage traditional majority cultures. 3. Adj. Of or pertaining to culturism, culturists or culturist policy.
---------
This is the first of a weekly, 8-part review of culturist policies. It will become a short e-book. Any feedback you could provide in terms of ideas or presentation would be appreciated. To prepare for the policy sections, this week’s entry will define culturist philosophy generally.


Culturist Agenda

Culturism is the opposite of multiculturalism. Whereas multiculturalism undermines the traditional majority culture’s status (being a Pakistani Dilo player is just as French as being a Jesuit), culturism acknowledges and supports the West’s traditional majority cultures.

Culturists disagree with the multiculturalists’ assertion that western governments must be culturally neutral. China’s immigration laws support Chinese identity; Iran’s curriculum promotes Islam. Western governments must also enact culturist policies to promote and protect their traditional majority cultures.

Islamic immigration is the number one threat to European existence. Islam is hostile to the West’s culture and existence. Cuturists also see dire potential in The United States’ Mexican descendant population believing that some US territory is Mexican. Thus, immigration control and assimilation are culturist policy priorities.

Domestically, multiculturalism’s anti-western agenda inciting racial tensions and the West’s declining morality are two large problems. Replacing multicultural guilt with western pride can largely reverse these problematic trends. Internationally, we must stop trying to make Muslim nations western.

Traditional majority culture?

The West’s ‘traditional majority culture’ exists at embedded levels. A village’s traditional majority culture should be protected concurrently with the national culture. And, if the local culture is traditional it will be congruent with the national culture. 

A majority Muslim community in England is not congruent with England’s traditional majority culture; so culturists would seek its transformation. On a larger scale, we can condemn NAZI culture for violating the wider West’s cultural traditions.

While nationalism has a hostile relationship to communities larger than itself, culturism acknowledges western nations’ shared history and interests and so offers more opportunities for unity. 

All nations, from Mexico to Saudi Arabia, and civilizations, from Asia to the Muslim world, are, and have always been, culturist. Only the West has embraced multicultural dismantling. Western civilization and nations also have a right to be culturist.

Culturism and racism

A culturist need not deny that racial IQ, temperament, and talent differences exist. But, as cultural unity is the goal of culturism, it is much more useful to focus on the fact that people of all races can be loving, hard working, moral, friendly patriots.

Acknowledging differential racial talents can be useful in countering the fractious multicultural myth that all disparities in achievement result from ‘White racism.’ Yet - since people cannot change their race - limited benefit can come from discussing race. On the contrary, all races and cultures can greatly benefit from culturist scrutiny.

And, yes, white people should take pride in having built a great civilization. But it is healthier to view this as western pride, rather than white pride. And, fantasies of making the ‘West white again’ are divisive and dangerous. 

Public Discussion

Islam is a violent, dangerous culture. Mexicans have high teen pregnancy rates. East Asians study hard and so succeed. Blacks commit a disproportionate amount of violent crimes. The White divorce rate has skyrocketed. These truths have policy implications we must be free to discuss.

Yet anytime you assert that non-White cultural diversity includes negative aspects, in order to squelch discussion, multiculturalists call you an irrational, phobic ‘racist.’ Instead of becoming defensive, we must proudly call ourselves rational culturists and reassert culturist truths. 

If we could get a politician or pundit to use the words ‘culturist’ or ‘culturism,’ they could go viral quickly. We need to discuss negative aspects of cultural diversity. Spread the words ‘culturist’ and ‘culturism’ today!

Donald J. Trump

When asked about inner-city crime, Trump talks about ‘jobs.’ When asked about his Muslim ban, he says it isn’t one; it is only a ban on some dangerous nations. When asked why we need a wall, Trump never speaks of the danger of having two cultures in your nation, (let alone assimilation).

Trump, in short, would be much more effective if he could speak honestly about culture. Yet, one suspects, he is terrified of being called a ‘racist.’ He needs to come out as a ‘culturist.’ We must be able to say that America, (like other western nations), has a traditional majority culture and judge people(s) by their fealty to it.

By spreading the words ‘culturism’ and ‘culturist’ we can help Trump reach his potential. Use them today!

You can find more information at www.culturism.us

TRUMP’S PRESIDENCY: THE CULTURIST CRITIQUE



You might remember my video about Trump being neither Alt-Right or Alt-Light (see below). Trump, I argued, is not Alt-Right because he is not racist. I have never heard him utter a thing about IQ or race or use the word ‘White.’ Actually, my video continues, Trump is not even Alt-Light, because he is not even consistently culturist. For example, Trump never criticizes Islam's intrinsic dangers or the inner-city ‘thug’ culture. 

Trump is neither racist nor culturist, Alt-Right nor Alt-Light. This very failing, that I pointed out in the video, is beginning to haunt Trump’s presidency. He needs to adopt a consistent culturist perspective if he wishes to succeed in reaching his policy objectives.

THE TEN COMMANDMENTS of PROPAGANDA: THE CULTURIST REVIEW

by Brian Anse Patrick
Arktos Publishing
204 pages

Reviewed by
John K. Press

I love the opening lines of Brian Anse Patrick’s book, The Ten Commandments of Propaganda. Published by Arktos, the book immediately tells the reader they’ve already been propagandized via the author evoking the Biblical Ten Commandments. Effective propaganda, Patrick explains, draws upon collective cultural memory.  His book is full of platitudes we really need to hear if we’re to be successful culturists and end multiculturalism.

PUNCH EVERYWHERE



Lately a chorus of admonitions has arisen amongst some in the alt-right commentariat, to the effect that that a loyal adherent to right-wing ideals ought never "punch right." 

By this, they seem to mean: 
If someone else who shares your essential viewpoint makes a tactical mistake or even does something that you consider to be gravely wrong, keep your negative opinion to yourself. By all means, share your concerns in private with other loyal soldiers of the cause, but defend the wrongdoer publicly because he is your comrade in arms, and because you don't want to give aid and comfort to the opposition by exposing dissension in your ranks.