MILO - LIVE IN MELBOURNE: A REPORT FOR ALTERNATIVE RIGHT

by Richard Wolstencroft

The date was December 4th, 2017. Milo Yiannopoulis rode into my home town of Melbourne on his Sedan chair to bring a little mainstream Alt Right mischief Down Under to the plebs and the normies. As one of Melbourne's top "Alt Righters" and head of the Alt Right field office in the Antipodies, naturally I had to pop along to see this wonderful circus.

TRUMP TACTICS

AN ANALYSIS OF RECURRING TACTICS, INDIVIDUAL STRATEGIES, AND LONG GAME OBJECTIVES

by Ptolemy3

We heard from the media it was mathematically impossible for Trump to win, yet after winning that "impossible" battle against establishment money, his victory was rationalized as anyone could have beaten Clinton. Now we hear that Trump is "unhinged" and clueless, while the same media outlets discuss "dumb luck" and whether Trump might be some kind of "idiot genius." All the while, whispers of "4D chess" circulate the darker corners of the internet

THE ALT-RIGHT, PUNK ROCK, AND FAKE BOOBS: AN ANALYSIS

Get your photo taken with the Alt-Right.

by Edwin Oslan

The worst thing about people who are full of shit is when they become fans of things that you both enjoy and are a much, much greater expert on.

I think I’m in some position of authority to state that most punk rockers don’t know as much as I do about the Alternative Right, or the general umbrella of the new right. And similarly I think it’s safe to say that most people on the Alternative Right have only a cursory knowledge of punk rock.

So, as someone who is a damn near expert on both of these topics – not saying I was ever on the vanguard of either of these movements – I think I’m at least qualified to call bullshit on a recent article published by Playboy magazine.

NAMELESS PODCAST: STAND WITH 'BASED STICK MAN'!

Kyle Chapman, aka "Based Stick Man," in quaduplicate

In his latest "Nameless" Podcast, Andy Nowicki considers the case of "Based Stick Man" (or "The Alt-Knight," the moniker preferred by Andy). Just weeks after kicking major antifa ass at a Trump rally in Berkeley, California, BSM finds himself under siege from grumbling WNs, many of whom seem unwilling to accept alliances from anyone who deviates from their all-encompassing ideology.

SPENCER PIVOTS "WEST" ON MILO

Spencer-Milo bromance back on?

by Duns Scotus

Like any true leader, Richard Spencer is known for his mercurial shifts in direction that are aimed at throwing his many slow-footed foes and dim-witted opponents off balance.

So it was no surprise to me when the public leader of our movement suddenly pivoted hard on the "Milo Question" and issued an article in his own name (Milo and his Enemies) that reversed his previous hard position on "Milexit" (shorthand for Milo's exit from the wider Alt-Right).

NAMELESS PODCAST: MILO, PEDOPHILIA, AND #PIZZAGATE

In his latest "Nameless" podcast, Andy Nowicki exposes the smorgasbord of intellectual dishonesty surrounding the coverage of Milo's dodgy comments pertaining to pederasty. He also examines the various ways in which the Cult-Marx Establishment in fact promotes sexual deviancy, and the "slippery slope" down which we are now tumbling with regard to pedophilia-apologists, in the cultural context of #Pizzagate.

MILO AND COGNITIVE DISSONANCE

...Do we need to?

by Colin Liddell

The big news, not just in the Alt-Lite and the Alt-Right but everywhere (including Mongolia), is the Milo Yiannopoulos Paedophilia Scandal.

This is yet another example of the "tyranny of words," where a public figure is expected to have a flawless record of statements that all line up with a consistent moral position, even when many of those statements are made in fast-flowing conversations, reacting instantly to other people, with shifting perspectives and changing levels of irony. As Cardinal  Richelieu once said, "If one would give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest man, I would find something in them to have him hanged." Nowadays when "they" want to gun for you, they have your whole online history to construct their nooses from.

SHORTPOD (3): THE DISPLACEMENT OF THE LEFT

A brief podcast by Alternative Right chief editor Colin Liddell, reporting on the site and events in the news. 

TERRORIST OFFSETTING AND THE SEXIST NATURE OF ANARCHO-TYRANNY

Anglin's attack on Luciana Berger set a
precedent for kicking people off Twitter.

by Colin Liddell
@cbliddell

When it comes to banning people and groups, and shutting down points of view, precedents are important, and so is moral justification. Powerful as the anarcho-tyrannic state governments and corporate social media companies of the West are, they realize that to overuse their power is to lose their power, and so, when they clamp down, they like to grease the wheels with a little moral unguent and emotional manipulation.

IT'S NOT ABOUT WHO'S IN THE MOVEMENT, IT'S ABOUT WHO'S NOT IN THE MOVEMENT YET

Would you accept your first red pill from this suspicious-looking individual? Probably not.

by Newfoundlander

When I saw what went down at the NPI conference I was livid and distraught. I wasn’t personally offended; I read and enjoy this kind of thing on TheRightStuff all the time. I get that it is ironic and in jest, and I find it funny. I know that Richard Spencer is not a Nazi. I’m not livid because of some kneejerk offense reaction on my part, I am livid because of the damage Spencer has done to the Alt-Right.

VIDEO: THE NOT SO "DANGEROUS FAGGOT TOUR"

After a brief introduction on video as a means of expression, Alternative Right Chief Editor, Colin Liddell, turns to the subject of Milo Yiannopoulos and the widespread claims that the gay, partially Jewish Brietbart editor is attempting to co-opt the Alt-Right and is a "mortal danger." The discussion of Milo begins at the 2:41 point. 

IN DEFENSE OF MILO YIANNOPOULOS

by Brett Stevens

Oi Vei!, the Alt Right struggles with self-definition yet again. Breitbart editor Milo Yiannopoulos is befuddling the Left.

"Following Out magazine’s recent profile of Breitbart Senior Editor, Milo Yiannopoulos, leftists have trotted out one of their favorite buzzwords: 'white supremacist.'

Lucas Grindley of The Advocate, who can be seen in this piece’s header image, wrote an article reporting on an open letter signed by over forty LGBT reporters and media professionals condemning Out for their profile of Milo."

CREEPING CARNIVALISM

by Alex Fontana

The following passage, describing the failure of the New Left in the 1960s and 70s, has a lot of relevance for our own movement:

"Ironically, just when the New Left was experiencing an unprecedented wave of support, its leading organization, SDS, which claimed almost a hundred thousand members and a million supporters, was being torn asunder by internal contradictions. Chapter meetings throughout the country degenerated into ideological squabbles as the Progressive Labor party (PL), a disciplined Old Left cadre, made a power play and tried to take over the SDS. The PL people were cultural conservatives; they wore their hair short, dressed straight, mouthed Marxist dogma, and dismissed lifestyle as a peripheral concern that diverted attention from the true working-class struggle. On repeated occasions PL castigated SDS regulars for being ‘escapist’ and ‘objectively counterrevolutionary when they spoke in favor of turning on. (Quite a few SDS members would have agreed with Arthur Kleps when he said, ‘Marxism is the opiate of the unstoned classes.’) PL also criticized propaganda tactics like guerrilla theater and rock bands at rallies as ‘creeping carnivalism,’ and they even claimed that Timothy Leary was a CIA agent who pushed acid on the Movement as part of an imperialist plot." (Acid Dreams: The Complete Social History of LSD: the CIA, the Sixties, and Beyond by Martin A. Lee and Bruce Shlain)

MILO YIANNOPOULOS REVITALIZES THE ALT-RIGHT?

by Brett Stevens

Apropos of recent calls for the Alt Right to wage war on Breitbart editor and troll auteur Milo Yiannopoulos, the man himself came to a nearby bloated city to give one of his more important speeches. Attendees like myself were rewarded with a vision of the Alt Right not as a singular thing, but as layers of a vital truth.

Yiannopoulos was compelling, and came across as nervous and even shy but earnest, which won the audience over completely. The pacing of his delivery was more like that of a comedian than a political speaker, but that worked very well, separating out the density of the material.

A NORMIE’S GUIDE TO THE ALT-RIGHT

Welcome to your new reality, Normies.

by Colin Liddell

How tedious! Apparently Hillary Clinton, in a desperate attempt to deflect attention from her shit health and crap policies, is going to deliver a pus-filled speech attacking the Alt-Right and attempting to link us to Donald Trump. Although the speech will be turgid and full of laughable errors, it will nevertheless be boosted by the flailing energies of the zombie mainstream media, and thus become – albeit temporarily – quite a big deal.

She will probably refer to sites like Breitbart (and its enfant terrible Milo Yiannopoulis) to establish a link to Trump, as well as The Daily Stormer, TRS, and The Daily Shoah, because their hilarious "stormfagging," shorn of its context, humour and irony, provides the "scary racism" that she needs to adorn her narrative.

The speech will bring wider attention to the whole Alt-Right, and as the name-bearer of the movement, our site should see an uptick in concerned or curious "normie" traffic. So, with that in mind here is a quick, dumbed-down guide to the Alt-Right for the uninitiated.

What is the Alt-Right?

Most of you normies probably understand politics through the GOP vs. Democrats or Conservatives vs. Liberal models. That is understandable, as that is all the mainstream media tends to focus on if they can get away with it. The Alt-Right rejects this simple binary form of politics for the following reasons:

(i) It is a false dichotomy

(ii) It ignores the metapolitical dimension

(iii) It embeds false premises in the political debate

Point (i) means that the two parties/political tendencies are not distinct or really opposed. Before Trump (and, to a lesser extent, Bernie Sanders) upset the apple cart, the two parties operated as an effective duopoly.

Slightly flawed meme

Both were essentially open borders, globalist parties, who held that ethnic and racial identitarianism (especially by Whites) was the capital sin. Both were agents of an economic system founded on exporting American debt and importing foreign unemployment. To do this they had to (a) destroy American jobs and (b) increase the public spending deficit to the point where debt creation soared. Both parties cooperated in this endeavour. The GOP enabled US investors to outsource production by lowering American tariffs, while the Dems made it more difficult to do skilled manufacturing at home (welfarism, minimum wage, affirmative action hiring, feminizing the workplace, etc.). The Dems boosted public spending while the GOP cut taxes, etc.

Point (ii) means that politics is not just limited to economics, but also involves cultural and philosophical dimensions. While, economically, the Dems and GOP have worked hand-in-glove on behalf of a poisonous globalism, there are differences between the supporters of the two parties regarding social and moral matters. Unfortunately for social conservatives, the Left entirely dominates the metapolitical realm in America, through its control of Hollywood, the media, and academia. This means that social conservatives have to put up with one Leftist advance after another. US conservatives appear not even to be aware of the metapolitical realm, let alone contest it. Hence they are forever outflanked by the Left.

Point (iii) means that the conventional political discourse accepts un-examined premises – points which are never properly debated because doing so is stigmatized as being evil and "literally Hitler." These premises, many of which are self-evidently false, are therefore "accepted" by both sides. These false premises are enforced by metapolitical means and through the tyranny of political correctness and Leftist control of the media. They include the following:

• All races are equal and interchangeable
• Racial difference is only skin deep
• Equality is a good thing
• Equalizing outcomes between races is a good thing
• Diversity is a good thing
• America is a "proposition nation" (and must accept new members even if they don't agree with the propositions)
• Men and women should be equal and treated the same in all things
• Gays and straights should be equal and treated the same in all things
• Nationalism is bad and leads to wars
• Globalism is good and leads to peace
• The Holocaust was uniquely evil and was caused by nationalism
• Slavery was uniquely evil
• Segregation is uniquely evil
• The economy must always grow
• Religion is a purely private matter
• Jewish power is not a thing (unless you claim it is)

Etc., etc. While some of these premises are still contended to some degree, the tendency is for them all to be enshrined against attack. You may secretly agree or disagree with these premises, but under the present system just questioning them, means that you will be demonized as "evil." Conservativism, with no metapolitical defences, is thus forced to go along with them. This weakness and deficiency is what called the Alt-Right into being.

Why is the Alt-Right?

As we see above, the Alt-Right is a movement founded on the need to reject the false political dichotomy that favours an increasingly Leftist and globalist world. But why should we be so opposed to this? The reason is quite simple: Leftist globalism is sick and degenerative, both in demographic and economic terms, and any individual or group that deems itself healthy – or which at least values health – must reject it.

Leftist globalism can only exist thanks to modernity and the power of technology. The more technologically backward or economically underprivileged areas are, the more they are forced to resort to traditional, localist, and hierarchical modes of existence, in order to survive. This is why Leftist globalism only exists in the West. But even with all its advantages, Leftist globalism is degenerative. We see this in the West, where the core populations are failing to reproduce and are thus in the process of being replaced by incomers from societies that are more technologically backward and economically underprivileged.

Migrants charging their smartphones
at a railway station in Budapest.

Because of the unexamined premise that "all races are equal and interchangeable," the Left does not see this as a problem, and thinks that the incomers will change and fully assimilate. The irony of course is that if they do, then they will suffer from the same inability to reproduce as the indigenous Westerners they are replacing, leading to a repetition of the cycle.

Ultimately, even by Leftist logic, the West – under Leftist Globalism – will forever be parasitical on non-Western populations to sustain itself.

Economically, Leftist Globalism leads to dysfunctional interdependence and power imbalances. I have already mentioned that America exports debt to countries such as China and Japan, which in return export their unemployment (in the form of manufactured goods) to America. The effect of this is that America has to absorb this unemployment through increasing social dysfunction. This takes the following forms:

1. racial grievances
2. high crime and counter crime
3. mass incarceration
4. unemployment
5. inefficiency
6. fake jobs and professions
7. prolonged "education"

An interesting case in point is America’s Black population. Up to 1971, when America created the global debt system, by abandoning the gold standard, the country exported more or less what it imported. It had to. The fiat system allowed it to start exporting debt, a negative. But economics has its own karma. To balance this, it also had to import a negative. That was unemployment. This became apparent in the 70s and 80s when Japanese goods started to flood the American market.

But while Asian – and to a lesser extent – European export economies could store American debt conveniently in bank accounts and ledgers, unemployment has to be stored socially – i.e. in the lives of the people. To achieve this America needed to achieve levels of extreme social dysfunction. One means of achieving this was racial grievance – epitomized in the collapse of American cities like Detroit – a process which started to accelerate around this time.

Unemployment storage device.

The growing social alienation of the Black underclass, expressed in the removal of coercion through social discipline (aka Civil Rights and "desegregation"), and resulting in high unemployment and crime, created vast reservoirs of "unemployment storage," both in terms of actual unemployment and mass incarceration, but also in terms of the creation of essentially fake jobs like prison warders, security guards, social workers, legal operatives, etc., that would not be required in a healthy society.

Other forms of unemployment storage were a massive expansion of the educational system, which is basically a nice, pleasant form of unemployment storage for middle class people, and the continuation and expansion of a Cold War military establishment, which can basically be envisaged as unemployment storage for rural and urban White working class people.

The tendency of Leftist Globalism is to increase this system of debt for unemployment resulting in social dysfunction, leading to America becoming an increasingly pampered parasite on a global economy, where the real jobs – and eventually the real power – go elsewhere.

Those in the Alt-Right, to various degrees, realize how the present system multiplies weakness and dysfunction, especially in the West, and, as a healthy response, are motivated to oppose it with a burning and fanatical zeal.

Who is the Alt-Right?

WHO IS THE ALT-RIGHT?

The Alt-Right is both message and medium, both substance and form. 

Those inspired by it gravitate to different aspects of it, and participate with different levels of consciousness and involvement. 

Part of this is because we are a heretical movement, which the establishment fears and attacks. But they never attack us on the level of ideas. Instead we are attacked on the personal, social, and professional level. The Alt-Right is thus divided into the doxxed and the undoxxed, reflecting our opponents' inability to defeat our ideas. 

As medium or form, the Alt-Right has been an aspect of the internet and social media. Many of its operatives have been anonymous individuals – the undoxxed – operating through memes, trolling, shitposting, tweets, and other forms or expression. The attitude is ironic, intuitive, edgy, and shocking.

As message or substance, the Alt-Right is a collection of ideas, moral positions, and insights into the World that, like any ideology, has to justify itself by its inherent tonality and consistency. Here it is tied to a number of thinkers and writers – the doxxed – who are not anonymous, who publish books, have names, and maintain a steady stream of ever-improving content. The attitude is clear, rational, precise, and understated. 

Because of the opposition we face, the Alt-Right has assumed this "bimorphic" nature, existing on dual levels of meaning, truth, and form, but centred around an unassailable ideological core, built on absolute truths. This is a complete inversion of Marxism's own dialectical bimorphism, with a totalitarian world view centred around a core of dialectical uncertainty and lies. 

In contrast to their dead bimorphism, ours generates vitality, fertility, creativity, and energy. It is dialectical in formalistic terms rather than ideological. This also fuels the noticeable infighting in our movement, among those who agree with each other on the deepest aspects.

But it would be wrong to see this as weakness. 

While infighting in static, "unimorphic" movements is a sign of weakness, in a bimorphic movement like our own, it generates a positive energy that constantly renews and improves the movement. This is why our victory is inevitable.

Connected Content:
The Alt-Right Conquers the Universe 
The Intellectual Vacuity of the Old Right
Trump, Hillary, & the Alt Right
1488 is the Gateway Drug to the Alt-Right, not the Other Way Round
The Alt-Right and the Dialectic of "Hyperrealisty"
The Lady from the New York Times
The Role of Trolling
Talkin' Pepe
Racism and Sexism Viewed as Aritotlean Virtues

SUPPORT US WITH A DONATION TO OUR PATREON ACCOUNT

MILO, TWITTER, AND THE ART OF "PERMANENT SUSPENSION"

by Colin Liddell

Twitter recently deleted the account of Milo Yiannoupolous (the on-line electronic Morrissey of our age). The social media company probably believes it is re-enacting the "wise" policy of the Roman king, Tarquin the Proud, who, when asked for advice by his son on how best to control the querulous city of Gabii, merely went to his garden and silently cut down the tallest poppies.

THE ALT-RIGHT AND THE DIALECTIC OF "HYPERREALITY"

by Alex Fontana

There have been a slew of articles lately that have been fumbling around trying to get a hold on this thing we call the “Alt-Right.” Good luck with that! Many of these have been reactionary pieces for mainstream ed-ops. The most notable was by the part-Jewish homosexual Milo Yiannopoulos, who has taken it upon himself to wear the mantle of Alt-Right pundit.

GAMERS ARE DEAD?

This excerpt is taken from Scott Cameron's new book Understanding #Gamergate, now available for purchase at Amazon.com

On August 28, 2014, the gaming and mainstream press officially broke their silence (on Gamergate) by simultaneously publishing 10 articles denouncing gamers. All of the articles claimed that gamers, the gaming culture, or the gaming identity were “dead.”

One of the articles, a Gamasuta piece written by Leigh Alexander titled “’Gamers’ Don’t Have to be Your Audience. ‘Gamers’ Are Over,” describes Gamergate as a group of “angry young men” reacting to a changing industry that is neglecting them. Alexander writes that young men whom gaming companies marketed their products toward in the past have matured and are either not playing games or have migrated to “more fertile spaces.” Today, (so her thinking goes) young men are but one of many consumer groups game developers tailor their product to. Hence, young men have become “angry”; hence, Gamergate.