Showing posts with label morality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label morality. Show all posts

THE LUXURY OF DEPLORING GENOCIDE

Atomised morality
by Colin Liddell

In his latest video (not yet deleted by YouTube), Boomer nationalist RamZPaul says the following:
"I would assume if you are a good person, no matter what someone's race is, you would not justify genocide, right?"
This is said in an attempt to shame some liberal/leftist commentator with regard to the situation in South Africa, where Whites are being methodically murdered by hate-driven Blacks and their proportion of the population is dropping fast.

ON THE WHITE NATIONALIST 'FERTILITY CULT'


Discerning readers ought to take note at the outset that I have long been a contributor to Alternative Right, even before I became a co-editor in 2013, before demoting myself to an assistant editor in 2015. Readers should also note that—as I have always made clear—I am not now a white nationalist, have never been a white nationalist, and don’t intend to become a white nationalist in the future.

Those who have a difficult time comprehending how an Alternative Right writer and editor could be a non-WN should go here to find out what the Alternative Right movement has always meant to me, as well as to others. But I wished to preface this critique of white nationalism with these clarifications, lest anyone accuse me of the dread act of “countersignaling.”

ON MORALFAGGING

The vast information reserves of the internet offer us paths paved with gold, fringed all around by wildernesses made of total and utter shit. Like most of us, I try to avoid wrong turnings that lead to junk content, but don't always succeed - especially when people who usually post good stuff sometimes veer off into personal ego-drama and histrionics. Lately I have been making the best of my occasional excursions into nonsense, by trying to extract some sort of useful insight from them.

UNDERSTANDING THE LEFT'S WEAPONIZATION OF CATEGORIES

Watch carefully...

by Colin Liddell

The greatest humiliations are to be outwitted by morons and shamed by scumbags, but that is exactly what keeps on happening to Conservatives whenever they run into the Left.

Based on what they espouse, the Left are clearly the lowest of the low. They freely believe in any number of ostensibly absurd and immoral ideas, but they nevertheless manage to run rings round their Conservative opponents, using a formula that should be relatively easy to understand and counter, but which Conservatives fail to do.

COLIN LIDDELL GUESTS ON MILLENNIAL WOES' "MILLENNIYULE HANGOUT"


The "Millenniyule Hangouts" are a series of one-on-one Google hangouts hosted by Alt-Right vlogger Millennial Woes over the festive period. 

For the 23rd hangout in a 10-day period, Alternative Right's Chief Editor Colin Liddell joined Woes to discuss Manichean vs. Aristotlean morality, the power of the Left, the tragedy of the Jews, the nature of the Alt-Right, and the challenges created by Trump's Presidential election victory. 

THE LIMITS OF WHITE TRIBALISM

Tribalism just isn't our thing.

by James Lawrence

In a classic 1995 article for American Renaissance, Michael W. Masters defended the “morality of survival” against what he saw as the self-destructive universalism of the Western peoples, arguing that morality should instead be practiced according to an in-group/out-group distinction.

This position has clearly been inherited by many on the Alt-Right, who propose to solve the problem of white passivity in the face of dispossession by narrowing our moral horizons. In this view, universalist ideals drive whites to engage in indiscriminate altruism towards other peoples at the expense of their own kith and kin; thus, whites need to do their best to forget about moral standards that encompass the whole of humanity, and revert to the “morality of the tribe” in which altruism is restricted to one’s genetic in-group and enmity or indifference are shown to those outside it.

MASS MIGRATION AND REVERSING THE POLARITY OF MORALITY


On a certain level morality is merely rationalization for what you want to do anyway. If you’re into paedophilia then, of course, you are suddenly intrigued by the issues and science surrounding infant intelligence and volition, as well as religious systems that seem more accommodating to it. If fucking sheep is your thing, you may wish to point out the “plausible idea” that killing them is already morally acceptable, so why not something they might even enjoy? If rent boys float your boat – and you want them cheap and keen – then you may be inclined to see the “moral utility” of ensuring that the migrant boats to Europe keep floating.

But morality is rationalization only on a certain level, because there is actually an absolute level where morality is connected to absolutes, and where there is no justification at all for fiddling with three-year olds, fucking sheep, or buggering doe-eyed bacha boys. Unfortunately, this absolute level requires much more intellectual rigour than most people are capable of, so morality is effectively an emotional dimension.

IN DEFENCE OF STATISM


"Every anarchist is a baffled dictator" ~ Benito Mussolini
My esteemed colleague Andy Nowicki has just penned an interesting piece denouncing certain perceived proclivities in the motivations of members of the Alt-Right in distancing themselves from Libertarianism. His article "In Defence of Anti-Statism" draws attention to two factors that supposedly drive anti-Libertarian tendencies in the Alt-Right, namely a wish to signal "intellectual maturity" and a desire to bluster about the up-side of authoritarianism. In particular, he takes issue with the notion that some people want to rule.

These observations are sure to prove controversial as many of the best and brightest on the Alt-Right found their way here over the loose and shifting sands of the Libertarian desert. I expect triggering aplenty and the rustling of jimmies.

THE ADVENT OF MORAL NATIONALISM



Morality can arise in two ways. It can either develop organically through custom, tradition, and culture, or it can be manufactured through laws, the mass media, or revolution. The prevailing globalist liberal moral system that exists in the Western world today belongs to the latter category, but in many ways, it is also more than that.

Aside from being a manufactured moral system, Western Morality, in its current formulation, aspires to be "universal" in nature, and it is this feature which makes it unique as a moral system. The universality of Western Morality is why anti-racism and multiculturalism has taken root in the Western World, and why so many Western countries are mentally incapable of protecting their borders against mass immigration. This is because a universal morality prevents people from thinking in terms of what is good or bad for their group.

SEX AND VIOLENCE TRADITIONALISM


Flannery O'Connor was an unapologetic, unreconstructed Southerner of staunchly Catholic and profoundly conservative orientation who wrote unsparingly dark, bleak, and violent stories. This disconcerted many readers, who couldn't understand why an author who believed in God and adhered to Christian precepts would so often dwell on such disagreeable subject matter.

Miss O'Connor gave reply in a 1957 essay titled "The Fiction Writer and His Country." It was precisely secular modernity's deadening effect on the individual conscience, she asserted, that necessitated her thematic emphasis on the sordid, the depraved, and the grotesque; people needed to be shocked, shaken up, and reminded of what was important. "To the hard of hearing you shout," she wrote, "and for the almost-blind you draw large and startling pictures."

RACISM AND SEXISM VIEWED AS ARISTOTELIAN VIRTUES

Aristotle: the original shitlord.


For Aristotle there were always two vices for every virtue. This was because of his belief in the “Golden Mean.” For example, the virtue Courage existed between a vice of deficiency (Cowardice) and a vice of excess (Rashness).

To emphasize the metapoint: Aristotle saw all vices as existing on a continuum with all virtues, with no wall between them. This is very different from the Manichean morality that later poisoned the West through Judaic theology.

What happens, however, if we apply this Aristotelian analysis to the major “vices” of the modern day, namely “Racism” and “Sexism”?

POLITICAL INCORRECTNESS AND THE MORAL BUBBLE


Deep in the bowels of hate and iniquity, lies a board that is filled with even more HATE and INIQUITY. This board is filled with "Stormweenies," "PUA womyn-hating serial killers," "maniacal neo-nazi reactionaries," "Cum-skins," "Shit-skins," "Butthurt prone AZNs," "Merchants" and "Libertarians."

This board, dear readers, is /pol/, which is short for "politically incorrect," and this super secret cabal of cis-privileged right wing super-nazis will bring about "The Great Happening" that will merge Ron Paul, Nigel Farage, Putin, George Zimmerman, Tila Tequila and Based Assad into the great hermaphroditic savior-messiah of the Western World.

THE DEATH MORALITY OF THE LEFT

Leftists: self abnegating and selfish at the same time.

by Colin Liddell

One of the chief characteristics of modernity is a departure from traditional morality, but merely deviating from such morality does not mean the abnegation of that morality, which is founded on eternal truths. Rather it is a form of negative affirmation of that morality. Therefore we should not be surprised that such deviation creates a strong sense of moral inferiority among those who choose that path, and thus impels a desperate need to offset it and reset the moral balance.

This simple psychological equation can be used to explain much of what we see in Leftism and why the extreme Left tends to attract the viler kinds of human being.

THE MORAL WELFARE STATE


Just like most countries in the West, the United Kingdom has now become a “moral welfare state” (MWS). Just like the socio-economic version, this involves helping those deficient in some way by imposing a kind of levy on the general population. Indeed, revealing the Left’s far greater success in the cultural realm than the economic, it could even be said that the MWS has made considerable progress and that now moral communism exists in the UK, where people live according to the dictum:
From each according to his morality, to each according to his depravity.