by Dennis Dale
Really? Is this really happening?
~Flash-mob victim
This ain't the Garden of Eden,
There ain't no angels above,
And things ain't what they're
supposed to be,
And this ain't the Summer of Love
~BOC, This Ain't the Summer of Love
The post-racial dream has become a nightmare. The use of social media to take over public space by surprise (the definition of “flash mob”, alas) for the purpose of recreational racist terror is this summer's trend.
Affected municipalities across the
country brace themselves ahead of heat waves and large public events; holiday
weekends loom like potential squalls on the horizon. Recession-lean
budgets strain to add police ("...we have deployed additional
officers..."): more police aren't always enough
("...shootings happened despite a high
police presence..."). Businesses
lose money and fear for the safety of employees. Some are harassed for closing their doors to
the chaos.
Suburbanites surrender the city and
stay home; events are cancelled, scaled back, starved.
Organizing ad hoc via social networking for the purpose of amusement, black
adolescents terrorize parts of the country like al Qaeda only wishes it could.
It all seems so long ago now. Once,
liberal Americans anticipated with perverse ecstasy a violent racist reaction
to an Obama presidency. This is not what they had in mind.
In the burlesque of Obama's first
presidential campaign, the occasional white rube documented fretting over
emboldened black racists was a recurring act, eliciting satisfied shivers in
the Good, and proving all the more the need for absolution by Obama. Fear of
“uppity blacks”—how quaint! What a reassuringly familiar theme! How comforting,
to see the good narrative, the one we've been steeped in since childhood,
playing out as scripted, in one's very own lifetime, with the promised marquee
villains hitting their marks and the handsome black hero in charge. Less
loftily, one could stick it to a despised Other (other white people—topsy-turvy
world!) and claim the moral high ground in doing it. Everything was so easy
then—virtue especially.
The production was on schedule until
the wrong crowd showed up for the mob scene. Who cast these extras? Without
script or direction, public officials are improvising--and the dialogue just
gets worse (the beatings were "barbaric", said
Milwaukee's police chief, but crime, like love, is “colorblind”).
But the dominant culture has taken
too big a stake in Barack Obama's role as racial healer to let the public
focus-group this ending. The problem is today’s reality plays out like the
earnest speculative fiction of 2008's presumed-phobics:
In the president’s adopted home of
Chicago, political and cultural center of black America, networking
teens—emanating from the same streets as young Barack Obama, community
organizer—randomly form in bands, terrorizing non-blacks and forcing the
closure of parts of the city before melting away like guerrillas—excelling a
national trend in just this sort of racist mob violence. Small-town
Pennsylvania remains dormant.
To deny his city was under siege,
new Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel, of all people, was forced into embarrassing
public obstinacy: fears of “heat stroke” in the 88 degree weather, and nothing else, prompted the city to close beaches along the lake into
which black adolescents happened to be throwing bicyclists for amusement. He
was roundly mocked.
The new mayor accepted the necessity
of this humiliation. Like one of the victims he won't acknowledge, Rahm checked
his dignity, took his beating and endured the taunts. Add the self-respect
of one of the most influential people in the world to the casualty list. No mean feat for the feral
children of Chicago's south side.
The trust Emanuel and his brand-new
police superintendent (I presume) hope to establish with Chicagoans will have
to wait. Superintendent McCarthy blithely invoked trust, while repeating the lie once more with feeling for the heckling crowd. The
irony was lost in all the irony. But trust was established:
the mayor has demonstrated, to whoever it is runs his city, that he knows how
to keep his mouth shut.
With fellow feeling the major papers
will ignore this latest example of a public official misleading citizens about
a criminal threat to avoid offending the same criminals--or black and liberal
sensitivities. Faced with a nation-wide outbreak of racist violence our
political and journalistic classes collude in Soviet levels of disinformation.
This debasement of our discourse is yet another consequence of the violence—precisely,
of the need to deny the nature of the violence.
Thankfully, the Great Recession is a
massive plausibility-generator. The general angst of the present. Catastrophic
unemployment. Cutbacks in summer programs. I don’t discount these things. Responsible
public servants will recourse to them so they can do what they can while
preserving the lie--and themselves. Invoking the general downward trend in
crime is already a common, if fallacious, means of distraction.
But obscurity has its
consolations. We get to ask. Does the recession explain the
trend? Not on paper. Black Americans poll disproportionately optimistic about the
future. President Obama inspires their
pride and confidence still. Black Americans are feeling much better than
other Americans about their prospects, because we have a black president. This
contradicts the hoary stock reply that black racism and violence always stem
ultimately from righteous grievance.
Neither does the video support the
recession ruse: the flash-mobbers (so confident in their indemnity they
document their crimes on camera for later boasting) are amused, giddy, joyful
even. What is expressed (often verbally) is not resentment of white privilege
but disdain for white weakness. This is an expression of power, not
powerlessness.
The world is turned upside-down. The
grandchildren of the civil rights movement now riot and plunder out of a sense
of entitlement.
The respectable media, perhaps
comforted by the fact the criminals are relatively few (barely seen from the
commanding heights), have cordoned off the story (with "context" and
"perspective" their Orwellian bywords) to keep
the creepy white racists out. The thing will play out, to whatever end, with no indelicate
commentary from them. In that silence is the tacit agreement: the physical
damage of the mobs is nothing as compared to the psychic damage the truth will
bring.
Where is the president? Where is
that promised leadership on race? It's difficult to imagine a white president
addressing the problem squarely, as an issue of black responsibility; Barack
Obama could. No single man has had--or will likely have again--this level of
moral authority among blacks and this much political power. But the president
will remain silent.
The fact is that rather than being
uniquely qualified to address the issue, Obama is uniquely hampered. This same
story that made him the most powerful man on earth romanticizes and politicizes
black racism. Our rapidly degrading reality stands out in relief against this
inviolate, rigid narrative. There is much embarrassment, and I hope a little
shame, in the silence of our race-rioters' apologists.
The narrative holds that we've
failed black Americans. But reality demonstrates black America is failing the
rest of us.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comment will appear after it has been checked for spam, trolling, and hate speech.