Would THIS face lie? |
by Andy Nowicki
In the movie Fight
Club, charismatic terrorist Tyler Durden chastises the more timid, never-named
narrator for advocating what Durden disdainfully calls “premature enlightenment.”
Durden uses this colorful, vaguely obscene-sounding
expression to refer to the tendency of an individual, following a protracted
period of mental anguish and spiritual suffering, suddenly to succumb to
“wishful thinking”: that is, all at once to see only what he wants to see, pushed into this state of
willed myopia by a desperate desire to manufacture inner peace for himself.
Such willed deceit, however, cannot stand. In fact, a person
cannot emerge from darkness until he genuinely discerns that light does indeed
exist. No one can artificially construct this light he seeks, nor can anyone attempt
to impersonate a state of illumination, absent personal knowledge of said light.
As long as this light eludes the seeker, the seeker—whether he likes it not,
and whether or not it wounds his ego to admit it—is still in the dark. His wish
to find relief is understandable, but his concomitant inclination to force “enlightenment”
amounts not only to a self-betrayal, but to a betrayal of the very cause of
truth-seeking. If one values truth for
truth’s sake, then one will always be honest in one’s reportage, even if the
result is a dark portraiture indeed.
False hope is worse than no hope, since it compounds despair
with deception and deceit. The artist who opts to create “hope” out of whole
cloth (including but not limited to those who elevate feculent politicians to savior-status), may think he is doing the world a favor by manufacturing a
phantom species of “joy” with no actual basis in reality, or by providing a
tacked-on happy ending when such a contrived finale has no organic relationship
to what precedes it, but he is in fact contributing to a loathsome pretense,
which heightens the crisis to an immeasurably greater extent than its previous
state, when the bleak truth had at least remained untainted by willful pretense
and ignoble chicanery.
One thinks, for example, of past stagings of King Lear which amended Shakespeare’s
crushing denouement—in which the
steadfast, loyal, and virtuous Cordelia is senselessly slaughtered, breaking
the poor king’s heart and effectively erasing his will to live—for favor of a more palatable conclusion, in which the beloved maiden gets rescued at the last minute, and is joyously reunited with her father before the curtain falls. While
audiences no doubt left this Lear in
a more cheerful mood, it still amounted to clear and present literary
sacrilege; Shakey-baby himself knew that such “feelgood” tripe just wouldn’t
cut it in the case of Lear, which
must be horrifically grim or (pace
Hamlet) not be at all. (Thankfully,
the depressing version of Lear is the
one which still stands to this day, and the brief, misbegotten reign of those
revisionist productions has long come to an end.)
Unfortunately, most writers lack the Bard’s singularly sound
instincts, artistic integrity, and brazen testicular fortitude. Neil Diamond,
for example, is certainly not to songwriting what Shakespeare was to
playwriting. Still, this pompadoured, sleaze-voiced crooner was surely onto
something when he began composing “I’m a Believer,” first recorded by the
Monkees in 1965. But what he had, he fumbled, desirous as he clearly was to
manufacture a bogus pzzz
op anthem gaudily celebrating the crowd-pleasing pap known
as “premature enlightenment.”
*************
Consider the first verse of the song, in which an embittered
loner strives pitifully towards a stoical perspective on matters of the heart:
I thought love was only true in fairy tales
Meant for someone else, but not for me
Love was out to get me; that’s the way it seemed
Disappointment haunted all my dreams.
The final line of this delivers packs an especially devastating
gut punch—this is pretty dark stuff indeed for radio-friendly pop music. The
second verse of Believer isn’t nearly so poetically resonant, but it still
has the virtue of containing the line, “What’s the point of trying? All you get
is pain.” Clearly, an uncompromisingly pessimistic perspective is being
unleashed upon the listener here… Perhaps we are being taught the need for
self-sufficiency in a world that can be cold and unsympathetic? Maybe through
the speaker’s travails, we are meant to learn that we won’t all find love; that, just as Tyler Durden lectured his
followers that they resolutely wouldn’t become
“millionaires and movie gods and rock stars,” regardless of what their
television told them, so would we likely not
meet and marry our perfect soulmate, that instead we would very likely wind up
alone, however much the endlessly sunny strains of radio-friendly pop music
promised us otherwise.
Ouch! In fact, to up the ante, I'll (ironically, given the context) quote the groovy love guru Austin
Powers, “Very ouch, baby.”
It’s all just a bit too "ouchy," in fact, which must be the
reason why our intrepid songster Mister Diamond finally got cold feet, and felt the
need to create an “out” from the distressing web of truth he’d spun in the
verses of his little ditty. Thus, we are subjected to the depressingly trite
and groan-inducingly shallow words of the (admittedly catchy) chorus:
Then I saw her face!
Now I’m a believer
Not a trace of doubt in my mind!
I’m in love; I’m a believer; I couldn’t leave her if I tried,
Seeing her face was
all it took to make our feckless speaker a “believer” in the possibility—nay,
the surety—of love for himself? Admittedly, there are some lovely faces out
there, but he must have known that before. How did another pretty face convince
him that his entire perspective was off kilter, to the point of eliminating
every last vestige of doubt from his consciousness? How did it erase the
disappointment which had heretofore thoroughly “haunted” his slumbering hours?
The listener will be forgiven for feeling a bit of doubt
himself concerning the veracity of the speaker’s sudden claim to harboring a full,
abundant, and abiding happiness, all from seeing a beautiful girl’s face. Such
a scenario is just idiotic, intelligence-insulting, and uninteresting…. In short,
premature. In fine, untrue.
Andy Nowicki, co-editor of Alternative Right, is the author of eight books, including Under the Nihil, The Columbine Pilgrim, Considering Suicide, and Beauty and the Least. He occasionally updates his blog when the spirit moves him to do so. Visit his Soundcloud page.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comment will appear after it has been checked for spam, trolling, and hate speech.