"PASSIVE AGGRESSION" IS THE EPITOME OF "WHITENESS" AND THE MODERN WEST

Passive aggression is shit-posting for normies.

by Duns Scotus

The Dissident Right has rather childish and naive ways of judging how well Whiteness (or Europeanness) is doing in a particular society. This tends to consist of how many classical Greek statues are put up in public places, how often classical concerts are held, how well attended "trad" Church services are, how "un-modern" the art is, and similar over-obvious metrics. Needless to say this is all rather crass, moronic, and laughable. 

Essentially these metrics are used because Diss-Righters are in love with the idea of being victims, and all these crude yardsticks are not only guaranteed to provide negative results, but can also be adapted to become figurative canes with which to self-flagellate. 

What I say next will of course shock the usual idiots, but Western societies have never been more "culturally White" than they are today.

The reason I say this is because the essence of Whiteness is passive aggression and society has never been more PA than today. In fact the idea of passive aggression maps quite well onto Richard Lynn's tri-racial r/K spectrum, with East Asians ("the true Whites"?) being on the "passive" end and Sub-Saharan Blacks being on the more "aggressive" end. 

BTW, all these terms sound rather negative, so, if that bothers you, or if you wish to discuss these ideas in "mixed" company, please substitute "assertive" for "aggressive" and "gentle" or "group-oriented" for "passive."

But can I describe a society, a culture, or an entire people as "passive aggressive"?

Well, let's see. First of all, a society is made up of social interactions. That is the key. How it does this will essentially constitute its "culture." This clear and precise definition, you will note, is opposed to the idea of consumer cultural artifacts that seems to predominate in the Dissident Right. Based on how we socially interact, the West has never been more passively aggressive than it is today. In PA is so dominant in our culture that even non-Whites who live in the West, be they Black, Asian, Muslim, Indian, or whatever, are forced to -- or encouraged to -- act in similar ways.

The Alt-Right see culture as fetish, not interaction. 

Now, what exactly is passive aggression? 

Reference to a standard source will instantly show you (a) how White it is and (b) how closely it maps onto the culture of the modern West. 

Here is the Mayo Clinic's pretty standard definition:

Passive-aggressive behavior is a pattern of indirectly expressing negative feelings instead of openly addressing them. There's a disconnect between what a passive-aggressive person says and what he or she does. For example, a passive-aggressive person might appear to agree — perhaps even enthusiastically — with another person's request. Rather than complying with the request, however, he or she might express anger or resentment by failing to follow through or missing deadlines.

Specific signs of passive-aggressive behavior include:

Resentment and opposition to the demands of others

Procrastination and intentional mistakes in response to others' demands

Cynical, sullen or hostile attitude

Frequent complaints about feeling underappreciated or cheated

There, that pretty much covers how the modern West operates. And while passive aggression is not a mental illness, these characteristics or symptoms are much more "florid" or "toxic" in the case of both the Far Left and the Dissident Right, which are particularly White in their ethnic make-up and general character. 

Let's break it down a little: 

Passive-aggressive behavior is a pattern of indirectly expressing negative feelings instead of openly addressing them. 

Both the Dissident Right and the Far Left fail to openly address the problems of the modern West, which are essentially quite simple in nature.
 

• Racial inequality is caused by fundamental racial differences, but the Left denies that. 
• Racial Replacement is caused by the fundamental freedoms the West granted its people, especially women, in accordance with its inherent individualism and through its scientific and economic progress. The Diss-Right, however, blames this on the Jews or a placeholder for the Jews, such as "Klaus Schwab," "They/them," etc. 

In both cases the Left and the Dissident Right project a negative view of society as eternally "racist" or eternally "Jewed."

What else can we see in the definition of passive aggressive?

"...a passive-aggressive person might appear to agree — perhaps even enthusiastically — with another person's request. Rather than complying with the request, however, he or she might express anger or resentment by failing to follow through or missing deadlines."

OK, this bit doesn't seem an easy fit at first, because the Mayo Clinic's definition is focused on individual workplace-centred cases. But in essence it does fit. In this passage, passive aggression is essentially a means of "opting out" of society and responsibilities while pretending to embrace them. That is the real appeal of both Far Leftism and the Dissident Right. It is a means of escaping the world of mental equilibrium, effort, discipline, and authentic involvement without looking like a hikikomori.  

Asian youth do not have to politicise their social failure with edgy politics.

This is also the Whitest part of passive aggression, which is that Whites have a tendency to "talk big" or "over-promise," which then leads to under-delivering or else a stretching to meet targets, which then creates a buried resentment of the stresses engendered. 

The passive aggressive actor turns to PA as a way of correcting the balance. Based on the how the various races align, you can easily extrapolate how the other races will, on average, deal with this in their own culture. East Asians in East Asia (as opposed to East Asians in the West) will try either do exactly what they say or else shoot it down at the beginning by not being enthusiastic.

But back to the definition:

Specific signs of passive-aggressive behavior include:

Resentment and opposition to the demands of others

Procrastination and intentional mistakes in response to others' demands

Cynical, sullen or hostile attitude

Frequent complaints about feeling underappreciated or cheated

These phrases fit the character of the modern West like a glove. In fact, the wokeness, White guilt, victimology, polarisation, irony, insincerity, sarkiness, and conspiritardary that are now rampant everywhere are all there.

Of course the usual idiots will still say that victimology is mainly a "Black thing," but that's simply not true. When Blacks do it, it is a warped form of assimilation to White society. Blacks in Black countries have no time for it. 

Also gays, women, and now increasingly even straight White males in the West all see themselves as nothing but "victims," and increasingly use this as an excuse to drag their feet in life, constantly moan, be cynical, or otherwise opt out of society. The only real difference between the Far Left and the Dissident Right is that the Far Left is simply more vicarious in its passive aggressive victimology.

Passive aggression is the central condition of White modernity and the stresses that it constantly generates. The culture of the contemporary West is merely the social aspect of this.