Introduction
Our police, airports, employers, anti-terror units and immigration officers need to engage in culturist profiling. But, they cannot do so because multiculturalists have convinced America that discussing negative aspects of cultural diversity is ‘racist.’ While race may increase predispositions to certain behaviors, culture regulates their expression. For example, as black two–parent families have been ruined by the welfare state, the black crime rate has risen enormously.
Framed as ‘racial profiling’ targeted groups feel somewhat justified resentment. By focusing on culture, ‘culturist profiling’ can provide valuable culturist feedback to impacted communities, reform mores, and save lives.
Culturist profiling of blacks
Though black crime rates are much higher than those of other groups, most blacks are not criminals. But, if a black person is sporting ‘thug-life’ attire, they have nearly confessed criminal affiliation and can be suspected of reported crimes.
Culturist profiling is rational and statistical. If at some future date, the black crime rate drops to that of whites, profiling of black youth should stop. And, conversely, if the white crime rate rose – for any category of crime – white profiling would then be justified.
In the meantime, honestly admitting the need for culturist profiling can help blacks be clear about the impact of welfare and family breakdown: both responsibility and hope follow this clarity.
Culturist profiling at airports
Being Muslim, male, named ‘Muhammad’ and traveling back and forth from a Muslim nation are all statistically associated with a risk of terrorism. People that fit this culturist profile must have extra scrutiny every time they fly.
Culturist profiling is not racist. Many Hindus have dark skin. Yet, no Hindus have committed international acts of terror. If your name is Krishna, and you’re flying from India, you do not merit culturist profiling.
Ironically, multiculturalists would literally rather you die in a fiery terrorist act than admit that cultural diversity is real. Blindness to cultural diversity is not a virtue – it is deadly.
Culturist profiling in employment
Muslims should not be hired as baggage handlers at airports, work in nuclear power plants or hold government positions related to national security.
Culturist Profiling limits
If Muslims works in an innocuous place, say a bank or shoe store, they should be protected against irrelevant discrimination, just like other groups.
Honest Muslims will understand the rationale behind culturist profiling in security-sensitive fields. Culturist profiling, if explained, need not create resentment.
Culturist Profiling at mosques
Mosques should be monitored for radical teaching because many condone terrorism and other anti-western practices. Additionally, radical mosque members merit scrutiny for possible repatriation.
But, Muslims who do not attend mosque or attend one wherein no radical doctrines are preached, should not be so scrutinized. Culturist profiling is both rational and subtle.
Culturist Profiling in immigration enforcement
These facts make Trump’s focus on the Southern border culturist, not racist. Yet, the two are not totally distinct.
If, in a traffic stop, if you look Mexican and speak no English, it is not unreasonable to assume you are in the US illegally. But, no matter your skin color, if you do not speak the nation’s language, suspecting you’re an immigrant is not unreasonable.
Cultural diversity is real and has predictive validity. We must be able to use culturist information when making and enforcing our laws.
Culturist profiling conclusion
Rather than being proof that the West is xenophobic, irrationally and racist, historical trends and statistical differentiation prove that cultural diversity is real. Our laws should recognize the existence of western culture and the reality of cultural diversity.
To save our lives and protect our civilization, our immigration laws, hiring practices, airport screening, domestic counter – terror initiatives and policing need to engage in culturist profiling.
------
Click the following to read the policy series intro or part two (culturist rights) or part three (repatriation).
You can read more about culturism here.
The evil Globalists are so confident they actually made a mainstream movie about what they are doing secretly before it even has fully played out. They do this as a psychological "sod you" and you are all our fools and dupes - we are the puppet masters. You know, we know it - but YOU cant say anything to defend yourself or call us out in public, even in your own countries as we own your Media and have created an atmosphere of silence apropos us and the main causes of your downfall,
ReplyDeletehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Has_Fallen
Not bad, here I can see how the culturist approach can make sense.
ReplyDeleteAs a little aid in fighting hypocrisy, some complements:
Culturist profiling in employment
Jews should not hold government positions related to national security.
Culturist Profiling at synagoges
Synagoges, and all jewish organisations actually, should be monitored for anti-white hate teachings because many condone anti-white hate and other anti-white practices. Additionally, synagoge members merit scrutiny for possible repatriation.
Culturist profiling conclusion
Divergent cultural doctrines like judaism and historically-based grudges of Jews against Whites rationally justify long-term culturist profiling, and have, in case of the Jews, so far historically resulted in hundreds of expulsions of Jews of non-jewish countries because of their subversion and their hostility towards the gentile population, and it is advised to perform accordingly as the profilings will show their inevitable results. Since Jews have a jewish nation state, it´s difficult to see why they should live in antisemitic countries.
Peter, You got me! For a second I thought you might have been making a positive comment. Then, I realized . . .
ReplyDeleteIt is often difficult for me to tell if a comment is coming from a far right person or a Social Justice Warrior. You wish to protect Islam and demonize Jews, right? You were probably a big member of the Divest movement, yes? So, not much difference.
I have likely been to synagogue 15 times in my life. And, in the English parts, I have never heard a word against the US. Yes, I have heard some liberal platitudes. And, yes, the Israel obsession is there, (it is after all, much of what the Bible is about). But no "death to America" "kill the disbelievers" message of Islam.
So, yes, go ahead and monitor. But, ultimately, as the article describes, culturist profiling must be rational and statistic based. After studying the statistics, you would not target Asians for homicide investigations. And, after monitoring synagogues, I'm sure you'd find zero terrorist plots applauded and have no basis for further monitoring.
So... there´s not a jewish problem... in the US... in the governmental insitutions, not to mention every other important sector of the country...
ReplyDeleteSo you suggest I´m not sufficiently against the moh-threat. How can you expect to be convincing when your position is that there´s no jewish problem? Maybe you might have a bit of succes if you were consistent in applying your method, but even then it´s all pointless as it´s not primarily pro-white.
So you know you won´t have the least bit of success on this site.
How, BTW, do you find the resonance to your work so far on this site?
And... so you want to raise awareness to the moh-problem it seems (lacking an explicit answer so far to the question what´s actually your point anyways) : how is that any different from the anti-jihad crowd? That field is worked intensely, since many years... and right for that reason that Whites can´t speak up for themselves in racial terms, so they have to pretend it´s an ideological issue... and these Whites have to vicariously live their racial self-assertiveness through the Jews, and hence pretend to be violently pro-Israel. The Jews, surprisingly, are allowed to have racial self-assertiveness. One has to wonder why... is it because the respective permissions are given by the media, and the media are owned by the Jews?? I guess we don´t have to expect an honest answer to that from you.
The Uneasy Dynamics of Rancor, Religion, and Rationality
ReplyDeleteReligion stands in the way of reason, but intellect or higher mental activity is impossible without restraint of savage nature, the animal rancor in the heart of every man. Savage nature is beastly & brutish and prefers breeding & fighting over reading and writing. It has no use for learning, reflection, or cultivation of heart & soul. It is about the law of the jungle.
Religion suppresses & restrains animal rancor and steadies & prepares the mind for reflection & contemplation. Thus, religiosity/spirituality cultivates the life of the mind even as scriptures place strictures on what can be thought and said.
Rationality had to break out of the taboos of religiosity, but then, reason could arise only after spiritual authority had forced chaotic animal rancor inside the cage and tamed it.
Reason is the bird that flew out of the cage of religion, without which the wild cat of animal nature would have devoured the bird while still inside the egg. For there to be higher freedom of the mind, the lower freedom of savage instinct must be tamed. And religion played a key role in restraining lower freedoms so that higher freedom could finally arise, though, to be sure, they had to break out of the confines of religious taboos.
As most people weren't sufficiently smart or privileged for higher thought, the only viable option for them were spiritually guided moral life of restraints OR animal-driven beastly existence of excesses. If most people were moral, a stable community was possible and could sustain institutions for higher learning. But if most people were barbaric, social chaos ensued and even smart people had to scramble just to survive. (There are smart people in Africa, but they can't cultivate the life of the mind because most Africans indulge in animal nature of jungle boogie. Same is true in most black-majority communities in the the West.)
With the fading of religious authority and the weakening of constraints on animal nature, we are now witnessing the degradation and destruction of Western civilization by the savagery of black thuggery, harlotry of slut pride, and decadence of homo vanity. Blacks are especially dangerous because their animal nature is more aggressive, wild, destructive, and beastly than those of other races.
If there is a kind of 'religion' in the current West, it is Political Correctness, the official dogma of Jewish-controlled Globalism, that enforces taboos on honest minds that notice that the Emperor has no clothes. Honest people see the reality of racial differences and its dire implications. They also perceive the threat to the West(or any sane civilization) posed by black savagery, homo degeneracy, Jewish supremacism(via globalism), and feminist insipidity, but inquisitional PC imposes the politics of silence, shunning, or witch-burning on any brave soul who refuses to cower before the court of globalist dogma.
Actually, shallow & stupid PC is worse than real religions, which, at the very least and despite their repressive dimensions, were grounded in genuine contemplation, profundity of vision, and reflection of higher truths. PC is just a disingenuous tool of Jewish supremacists to bait and milk 'white guilt' so that there won't be a viable challenge to Jewish Power.