OK, this is just a theory of mine, but I think it holds a steadily rising level of (sea) water:
The truth is that White middle-class liberals are riddled with guilt because they are not living wholesome lives. A wholesome life, by the way, is simply one that involves doing your bit to maintain a healthy society. It does not consist of moral signalling on social media.
What it does consist of is being a credit to your family, society, and ancestors, and helping to maintain healthy demographics. This means doing the heavy lifting of having families, something that most White middle-class liberals feel is rather onerous, and only ever do with foot-dragging reluctance. Which, of course, is why they have a total fertility rate of probably less than one. Back in 2006, ABC News reported that Conservatives were having 41% more children than Liberals, but I'm sure it's even worse today.
It is hard to live such unwholesome lives and not feel guilt. It simply seeps out of one, and surges up through the body until it coagulates like a choking black mass in the throat.
But what if we can convince ourselves that the World is really, definitely, and for certain heating up and that, although this is unlikely to impinge on our present pleasures, it sure as hell is going to make the whole globe uninhabitable two or three generations down the line?
The main psychological pay-off for guilty White liberals leading unwholesome lives is immediately apparent—not prioritising kids or even being anti-natalist is no longer the guilt fest that it naturally should be.
Instead, doing exactly what the bad side of your nature wants—screwing around, not marrying, indulging yourself in materialistic pleasures, etc.—becomes the "moral position," as you kid yourself that you are now trying to "save the planet."
The fact that middle-class White people not having kids will have zero impact on the vast amount of pollution pouring out of the Third World is, of course, conveniently ignored. Indeed, crashing the White, middle-class demographic only helps to eliminate the tiny portion of the World's population that has any interest in environmentalism.
This pattern of fervid embrace of a disgusting anti-moral cope is exactly what we see in the case of childless German feminist Verena Brunschweiger. Promoting her new book "Kinderfrei statt Kinderlos" (Child-free rather than Childless), she has called on Germans to stop having babies in order to "save the planet," despite Germany's migrant-assisted fertility rate falling to just 1.4 children per woman! (By the way, this birthrate means that a group of 100 people would shrink to 70 in the next generation, 49 in the second generation and 34 in the next, etc.)
In an interview with Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung, translated into English at several sites, she states:
As you can see, she is not bad looking and would "scrub up well."
My guess is that she doesn't want to have babies because feminism and female hypergamy have made her detest the generality of men, and she was of course unable to get more than pumped and dumped by "Chad."
Also, like many Western women, she is too attached to her comforts, and is probably physically terrified of the rigours of childbirth, as well as the loss of status motherhood brings in our sick. perverted society. Nonetheless, all this selfishness leaves people like Verena feeling shitty and guilty, and primes them emotionally and psychologically to believe any theory that predicts soaring climate chaos and a coming apocalypse.
Add to this the echo-chamber effect of millions of other guilt-ridden White liberals and you can see why climate hysteria has been such a hit—although temporarily obscured by that other hysteria: coronavirus!
The science of climate change is a minor detail. It may even be true that the world is heating up and we are all doomed. But what has truth got to do with it? People only believe lies or truths when they have the psychological predisposition to do so. The climate hysteria that posits the death of the World a few decades after we have all finished having our pleasure with it is the perfect psychological fit for spoilt middle-class Whites living their unwholesome and vacuous lives.
Colin Liddell is the Chief Editor of Affirmative Right and the author of Interviews & Obituaries, a collection of encounters with the famous and the dead. Support his work, which is carried out under constant threat of deplatforming in our tyrannous age, by buying it or donating to this site at the link below.
The climate change hysteria is being driven by childlessness in the West.There, that's it. It's not complicated, nor is it rocket science. But perhaps it needs a little elaboration, especially the subtle connection between White middle-class liberals putting off marriage 'n' kids till it's too late and screaming about climate change on social media.
The truth is that White middle-class liberals are riddled with guilt because they are not living wholesome lives. A wholesome life, by the way, is simply one that involves doing your bit to maintain a healthy society. It does not consist of moral signalling on social media.
What it does consist of is being a credit to your family, society, and ancestors, and helping to maintain healthy demographics. This means doing the heavy lifting of having families, something that most White middle-class liberals feel is rather onerous, and only ever do with foot-dragging reluctance. Which, of course, is why they have a total fertility rate of probably less than one. Back in 2006, ABC News reported that Conservatives were having 41% more children than Liberals, but I'm sure it's even worse today.
It is hard to live such unwholesome lives and not feel guilt. It simply seeps out of one, and surges up through the body until it coagulates like a choking black mass in the throat.
But what if we can convince ourselves that the World is really, definitely, and for certain heating up and that, although this is unlikely to impinge on our present pleasures, it sure as hell is going to make the whole globe uninhabitable two or three generations down the line?
The main psychological pay-off for guilty White liberals leading unwholesome lives is immediately apparent—not prioritising kids or even being anti-natalist is no longer the guilt fest that it naturally should be.
Instead, doing exactly what the bad side of your nature wants—screwing around, not marrying, indulging yourself in materialistic pleasures, etc.—becomes the "moral position," as you kid yourself that you are now trying to "save the planet."
This pattern of fervid embrace of a disgusting anti-moral cope is exactly what we see in the case of childless German feminist Verena Brunschweiger. Promoting her new book "Kinderfrei statt Kinderlos" (Child-free rather than Childless), she has called on Germans to stop having babies in order to "save the planet," despite Germany's migrant-assisted fertility rate falling to just 1.4 children per woman! (By the way, this birthrate means that a group of 100 people would shrink to 70 in the next generation, 49 in the second generation and 34 in the next, etc.)
In an interview with Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung, translated into English at several sites, she states:
“It is…above all because of the masses of people that we have such big environmental problems. We are just too many and hardly anyone wants to limit themselves. If we were fewer people and restricted ourselves, we could save something.”
 |
| Verena, horrifically adding 1 to the world's population. |
My guess is that she doesn't want to have babies because feminism and female hypergamy have made her detest the generality of men, and she was of course unable to get more than pumped and dumped by "Chad."
Also, like many Western women, she is too attached to her comforts, and is probably physically terrified of the rigours of childbirth, as well as the loss of status motherhood brings in our sick. perverted society. Nonetheless, all this selfishness leaves people like Verena feeling shitty and guilty, and primes them emotionally and psychologically to believe any theory that predicts soaring climate chaos and a coming apocalypse.
Add to this the echo-chamber effect of millions of other guilt-ridden White liberals and you can see why climate hysteria has been such a hit—although temporarily obscured by that other hysteria: coronavirus!
The science of climate change is a minor detail. It may even be true that the world is heating up and we are all doomed. But what has truth got to do with it? People only believe lies or truths when they have the psychological predisposition to do so. The climate hysteria that posits the death of the World a few decades after we have all finished having our pleasure with it is the perfect psychological fit for spoilt middle-class Whites living their unwholesome and vacuous lives.
______________________________________
Colin Liddell is the Chief Editor of Affirmative Right and the author of Interviews & Obituaries, a collection of encounters with the famous and the dead. Support his work, which is carried out under constant threat of deplatforming in our tyrannous age, by buying it or donating to this site at the link below.
