Like so many Western nations Australia is locked into a fairly binary choice when it comes to politics. There are two main options, perhaps best described as ‘bad’ and ‘worse’ depending on your particular ideological slant. Now that’s a bit cynical, but right now Australia faces a choice between two leaders who, according to the polls, are incredibly unpopular.
The current government is a Labor one under the Prime Ministership of Julia
Gillard, Australia’s first female leader. Her government couldn’t rule in its
own right and only hangs onto power via a coalition with the Greens and
independents. In recent times this alliance has become strained to put it
mildly. Some attribute Gillard’s post election about face on the carbon tax to
the influence of the Greens, whilst the Greens themselves are unhappy with her
failure to support gay marriage and shut down certain coal fired power
stations, to name just two issues. The Coalition was predicted to win the next
election by a landslide as state Labor governments were swept aside, but under
the leadership of the not terribly well liked Tony Abbott, it could well be an
even race.
Abbott is a Catholic and a classic conservative, but what probably worries
many voters is his former incarnation as a party ‘head kicker’ – he was the ‘go
to’ man for all the unpleasant stuff that politics thrives on. He was also
pivotal in the demise of One Nation leader Pauline Hanson’s political career.
Hanson demonstrated that a large chunk of the Australian electorate were unhappy
with the two major parties, and people supported her for a wide range of
reasons from trade protectionism to cultural issues and myriad other
perspectives. Some understood that democracy needs to be supported above
ideology, and what happened to Hanson is bad for the former no matter what
anyone may think of the latter.
"BIG
AUSTRALIA"
Labor went into the last election on the back of the deeply unpopular Kevin
Rudd being replaced by Julia Gillard within the party. The way she came to
power made the electorate suspicious. Eventually Labor returned to power after
negotiating with the Greens and independents, but it was always going to be
extremely tenuous. Gillard went into the election promising to turn away from
the record immigration rates contributing to what is being called a ‘Big
Australia’ scenario, and not introduce a carbon tax. She’s reneged on both
promises, the latter due to the influence of the Greens primarily.
When Labor ousted the longstanding Coalition government of John Howard in
2007, they inherited a $90 billion surplus. That is now gone and the nation is
said to be borrowing as much as $100 million a day. Where the money has gone is
not entirely clear, although Rudd’s ‘stimulus spending’ during the GFC accounts
for some. Large chunks of prime agricultural land are also being sold off, most
notably to China, which is starting to cause concern in some quarters. Added to
this is the asylum seeker debacle. After a great many fatalities as unseaworthy
boats tried to make the perilous crossing to Australia from Indonesia, Gillard
has gone back to the idea of offshore processing – a policy that was widely
criticized under the Howard administration, but none the less radically lowered
the number of arrivals. It’s probably fair to say that her government has been
perceived as lacking policy initiative on this issue.
So the current state of play is we have a government that has reneged on key
election promises and plucked policy from a past government. They hang on by a
thread, but the alternative is also regarded with deep suspicion by the
electorate. Both major parties are notorious for changing policies depending on
who is leading and there are plenty in the Liberal party who would present a
very different platform if they were leader. A leadership change before the
next election seems to be the only way the Coalition will deliver the landslide
that was expected just a few months ago.
GLIMMER OF HOPE
If there is any hope for Australian politics some attention must be given to
a range of minor parties that are starting to become more widely known. For a
long while the Democrats ‘kept the bastards honest’ by holding the balance of
power in the Senate. A centrist party they played a pivotal role in getting
environmental issues on the agenda amongst other things. Divisive leadership
issues and a key defection to Labor smashed their voter base, but there are
signs they are rebuilding and this next election could provide some
opportunities for them. One Nation continues to chug along, although with very
little support compared to when Hanson was at the helm. Concerns about record
population growth led to the more recent creation of the Stable Population
Party of Australia. Fronted by the eminently reasonable William Burke, SPPA is
attracting considerable support both at a grassroots level and from a range of
high profile figures most notably businessman Dick Smith. The SPPA presents a
well argued and considered approach to policy affecting Australia’s future, and
like the Democrats they may benefit from the general lack of support the two
majors are experiencing.
The Sex Party owes its formation to issues relating to the adult
entertainment industry and pursues a libertarian stance. The party has a wide
range of policies now and proved to be the powerbroker in a recent inner city
battle between Labor and the Greens. The Australian Protectionist Party
embodies ‘protectionist’ policies aimed to safeguarding Australian industry,
sovereignty and cultural identity. They are probably the closest thing to a
nationalist party operating at the moment, aside from One Nation. Their
following at this stage isn’t huge but ethnic tensions in Sydney where they
originate may well help their cause.
A wildcard in the next election is the Labor and Greens relationship. To say
it has soured is an understatement, and if the recent state by election in
Victoria is anything to go by, they may well tackle each other head on, which
can only benefit the Coalition. Overall Greens support seems to be declining
and part of this may be because they are championing non environmental issues,
some of which are proving divisive to their core supporter base. A battle with
Labor could be extremely damaging.
Right now the polls suggest a Coalition win, albeit with an unpopular
leader. Doubtlessly a Coalition government will stick with offshore processing
of asylum seekers, which has acted as a big deterrent in the past. Immigration
may go down slightly, but it’s hard to see either party backing away from the
high levels because the development lobby is so strong. The Coalition tends to
be sound financial managers, but usually achieve their surpluses via unpopular
cuts. In essence Australia is faced by two generally centrist options, neither
of which seems able to back away from a raft of policies beholden to globalist
interests. There are some great politicians in the major parties, but the
present state of affairs is best described as a duopoly. Life in Australia is
still too comfortable to awaken any real political activism in the populace.
But if we continue to literally sell off the farm and population soars, one
day there may not be affordable food in the supermarket, and then perhaps
Australians will take a greater interest in politics.
This article was originally published on the website of Civil Liberty, an organization in the
UK dedicated to fighting the tyranny of political correctness.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comment will appear after it has been checked for spam, trolling, and hate speech.