 |
| Anything that serves an elite agenda is probably being misreported. |
In the last decade or two, almost all Western societies have become gay supremacist states. In these states, gays are celebrated and lauded, while non-gays are subtly or not so subtly oppressed in various ways -- "Just bake the cake, bigot!!!"
While gays are regarded as elevated beings, whose sexuality allows them to "transcend" the staleness and conformity or cisgendered reproductional existence, "sexual normies" are viewed as lower creatures, cursed with the original sin of homophobia, which means the entire culture has to be turned into a non-stop, North-Korean-style re-education camp.
To celebrate the hegemony they hold over Western societies, the gay supremacists hold "gay pride" parades, while multinationals, one after another, bend the knee to them by clearly identifying their brands with the rainbow flag of LGBTQ+ dominance. So, when we hear, as we recently did, that there was an attack on two gay women in London, it is, to say the least, a little surprising. We may even be permitted to wonder if everything we are being told is in fact true.
The bare bones of the case are as follows: Melania Geymonat, a woman of Uruguayan origin and her American girlfriend, known simply as Chris, were riding on a night bus in London after midnight when they had a conversation with at least five youths between the ages of 15 and 18 that resulted in violence. Pictures were released showing the women blooded, while later reports said at least five youths had been arrested.
Now, all sorts of things could have happened, and the situation is far from clear, but already all the nation's main politicians have come out and denounced what is being called an "attack" and "homophobic and misogynist violence."
Britain's lame duck PM Theresa May instantly issued a statement:
So, what really happened on that night bus? What can we reasonably infer?
The gay couple claim that the youths had behaved in a "homophobic" manner and attacked them. Really, I am not even sure what "homophobic" means anymore as it seems to mean whatever gays and Leftists want it to mean. As with almost all so-called hate-speech terminology, there is simply no reliable working definition. So let us discard that unhelpful word, which has been used to program people to have a Pavlovian response.
Also, just because Melanie and Chris came off worse in the melee, that does not necessarily mean that they were the party attacked. In the feminist and gay supremacist society that Britain has become, privileged and entitled lesbians are more than capable of laying their hands on any member of the "cisgender peasant class" who doesn't show the due respect to their gay and female privilege.
There are clearly odd gaps in the narrative that Geymonat has been putting out. Also remember it that is only her side of what will be a multifaceted story:
“The next thing I know is I’m being punched."
Forgive me if I don't buy this lock, stock and barrel. It just seems that quite a lot is missing. Sudden escalations in violence, while seldom justifiable, often have their own logic and are usually triggered by specific words or action. What happened just prior to things getting violent and why is Geymonat being needlessly vague there?
In one interview, Geymonat says that the conversation with the youths may have been sparked because they saw them kissing. This is now being dropped from most accounts of the story because the media is focusing on the more juicy story line of homophobic youths trying to force the lesbians to kiss.
A much more likely account of what happened is that the youths, probably lower class, noticed the lesbians kissing and then started to chat them up in what they regarded as a jokey way but which the middle class lesbians regarded as a disrespectful way. At first both parties appear to have used jokes and banter:
Geymonat said:
Anyway, a reasonable surmise of what happened is that these two gay women found themselves in a situation where their freedom to openly kiss on a night bus in the small hours of the night was not being met with the requisite respect and deference that they expected in a gay supremacist capital city. It is a good bet that one of the lesbians then may have said something to escalate the situation and may even have lashed out in violence at the youths, leading to the violent melee in which they were hurt.
There are of course other possibilities, as the youths may also have attacked them in anger or on purpose, as it is reported that the women were also robbed.
This raises the question of just who these youths were. As they are aged 18 or under it is unlikely that their names or photos will be released soon. Given London's ethnic gang problems, I would say there is a more than average possibility that the youths in this case were Afro-Caribbean, which adds an interesting twist because Chris has attempted to connect the attack on them to "right wing populism":
But even if this is a case of White youths joshing with a couple of lesbians and then subjecting them to an attack, the key point is the degree to which an essentially minor fracas with no serious injuries has become the leading news story in the UK. Remember this is country where the heterosexual rape of thousands of underage, White, lower class girls literally took decades to break.
The victimhood in that case served no useful purpose, quite the reverse in fact, as Britain is also a anti-White state, so it was ignored and buried. But in this case, whatever actually happened, the sight of two lesbians with a little blood on their faces serves a very useful purpose indeed, as it helps to reinforce Britain's gay supremacist state.
While gays are regarded as elevated beings, whose sexuality allows them to "transcend" the staleness and conformity or cisgendered reproductional existence, "sexual normies" are viewed as lower creatures, cursed with the original sin of homophobia, which means the entire culture has to be turned into a non-stop, North-Korean-style re-education camp.
To celebrate the hegemony they hold over Western societies, the gay supremacists hold "gay pride" parades, while multinationals, one after another, bend the knee to them by clearly identifying their brands with the rainbow flag of LGBTQ+ dominance. So, when we hear, as we recently did, that there was an attack on two gay women in London, it is, to say the least, a little surprising. We may even be permitted to wonder if everything we are being told is in fact true.
The bare bones of the case are as follows: Melania Geymonat, a woman of Uruguayan origin and her American girlfriend, known simply as Chris, were riding on a night bus in London after midnight when they had a conversation with at least five youths between the ages of 15 and 18 that resulted in violence. Pictures were released showing the women blooded, while later reports said at least five youths had been arrested.
Now, all sorts of things could have happened, and the situation is far from clear, but already all the nation's main politicians have come out and denounced what is being called an "attack" and "homophobic and misogynist violence."
Britain's lame duck PM Theresa May instantly issued a statement:
“This was a sickening attack and my thoughts are with the couple affected. Nobody should ever have to hide who they are or who they love and we must work together to eradicate unacceptable violence towards the LGBT community.”While Labour party leader, Jeremy Corbyn, also jumped in:
“We must not, and will not, accept this homophobic and misogynist violence in our society. Solidarity to Melania and Chris, and to all in the LGBT+ community for everything they endure for simply being who they are.”This seems somewhat premature, to say the least, as this was a confused incident on a night bus in a multicultural city that often resembles a mix between a zoo and a circus. Can the true story be known so instantly? Isn't it wiser for politicians to find out exactly what happened before lunging in like this? Obviously yes, but not in a gay supremacist state like modern Britain.
So, what really happened on that night bus? What can we reasonably infer?
The gay couple claim that the youths had behaved in a "homophobic" manner and attacked them. Really, I am not even sure what "homophobic" means anymore as it seems to mean whatever gays and Leftists want it to mean. As with almost all so-called hate-speech terminology, there is simply no reliable working definition. So let us discard that unhelpful word, which has been used to program people to have a Pavlovian response.
Also, just because Melanie and Chris came off worse in the melee, that does not necessarily mean that they were the party attacked. In the feminist and gay supremacist society that Britain has become, privileged and entitled lesbians are more than capable of laying their hands on any member of the "cisgender peasant class" who doesn't show the due respect to their gay and female privilege.
There are clearly odd gaps in the narrative that Geymonat has been putting out. Also remember it that is only her side of what will be a multifaceted story:
"Describing the incident in a Facebook post on Friday, Geymonat said she and her girlfriend were subjected to homophobic abuse while being beaten up. “They started behaving like hooligans, demanding that we kissed so they could enjoy watching, calling us ‘lesbians’ and describing sexual positions … The next thing I know is that Chris is in the middle of the bus fighting with them.In this confused account, the attack comes while being "subjected to homophobic abuse" but also it comes after being "subjected to homophobic abuse." Which is it? The violence also seems to flare up quite suddenly:
“The next thing I know is I’m being punched. I got dizzy at the sight of my blood and fell back. I don’t remember whether or not I lost consciousness.”
“The next thing I know is I’m being punched."
Forgive me if I don't buy this lock, stock and barrel. It just seems that quite a lot is missing. Sudden escalations in violence, while seldom justifiable, often have their own logic and are usually triggered by specific words or action. What happened just prior to things getting violent and why is Geymonat being needlessly vague there?
In one interview, Geymonat says that the conversation with the youths may have been sparked because they saw them kissing. This is now being dropped from most accounts of the story because the media is focusing on the more juicy story line of homophobic youths trying to force the lesbians to kiss.
 |
| You cisgendered peasants are going to pay for this! |
Geymonat said:
"They surrounded us and started saying really aggressive stuff, things about sexual positions, lesbians and claiming we could kiss so they could watch us.The coins being thrown is probably a reference to inviting them to "perform," rather than using the coins as missiles, and sounds like something the youths might have done after seeing the lesbians kissing.
"To ease the situation I tried to make some jokes, like Chris, wasn't understanding because she didn't speak English.
"She even acted as if she was sick... but they started throwing coins. The next thing I know Chris is in the middle of the bus and they are punching her.
"So I immediately went there by impulse and tried to pull her out of there and they started punching me. I was really bleeding."
Anyway, a reasonable surmise of what happened is that these two gay women found themselves in a situation where their freedom to openly kiss on a night bus in the small hours of the night was not being met with the requisite respect and deference that they expected in a gay supremacist capital city. It is a good bet that one of the lesbians then may have said something to escalate the situation and may even have lashed out in violence at the youths, leading to the violent melee in which they were hurt.
There are of course other possibilities, as the youths may also have attacked them in anger or on purpose, as it is reported that the women were also robbed.
This raises the question of just who these youths were. As they are aged 18 or under it is unlikely that their names or photos will be released soon. Given London's ethnic gang problems, I would say there is a more than average possibility that the youths in this case were Afro-Caribbean, which adds an interesting twist because Chris has attempted to connect the attack on them to "right wing populism":
“A lot of people’s rights and basic safety are at risk. I want people to feel emboldened to stand up to the same people who feel emboldened by the rightwing populism that is, I feel, responsible for the escalation in hate crimes. I want people to take away from this that they should stand up for themselves and each other.”Yes, this is how mad things could be here -- a couple of White lesbians get beaten up by a gang of Black, Asian, or left-wing White youths and end up blaming the whole thing on Donald Trump. Really, would anyone reading this be surprised if that happens?
Geymonat added: “The violence is not only because we are women which are dating each other. It’s also because we are women.”
But even if this is a case of White youths joshing with a couple of lesbians and then subjecting them to an attack, the key point is the degree to which an essentially minor fracas with no serious injuries has become the leading news story in the UK. Remember this is country where the heterosexual rape of thousands of underage, White, lower class girls literally took decades to break.
The victimhood in that case served no useful purpose, quite the reverse in fact, as Britain is also a anti-White state, so it was ignored and buried. But in this case, whatever actually happened, the sight of two lesbians with a little blood on their faces serves a very useful purpose indeed, as it helps to reinforce Britain's gay supremacist state.
 |
| The gay supremacist empire is shown in oppressive pink |
