 |
| Miley Cyrus, munching on a truncheon. |
As America's elites have become increasingly detached from the core of the country, the oligopoly that has been running the state since the beginning has become increasingly reliant on "gaslighting" the public by mass media saturation and distortion.
But the stubbornness of the Trump campaign is proving dangerous to the established order because it is forcing them to show their hand and reveal their methods to an increasing number of people, who have been economically, emotionally, and now racially primed to see the manipulation that is under way.
A key element of this process is always to present everything out of proportion in such a way as to benefit the agenda. Nothing makes this clearer than the recent "Pussygate" scandal that was used by the backstabbing cuck tendency in the GOP—stand up Paul Ryan and the Bushes—to launch the latest, unsuccessful cuck d'etat against Trump, which, while it was live, was ably assisted by the mainstream media.
Maybe some future Wikileaks email drop will reveal that this move was triggered by growing Saudi—and therefore Bush—fears over a Trump presidency, intensified by the increasingly desperate state of the Wahabiist forces in the Syrian city of Aleppo. Trump famously does not care one jot about Saudi interests (and, in a touchingly naive way, about American petrodollar interests either.)
"Pussygate" is interesting because, once you get past the obviously vulgar tone (something that shouldn't be too hard in a society where major pop stars allow fans to fingerfuck them on stage and every city has a "Gay Pride" parade, where essentially anything goes), then what Trump actually said to the idiot scion of the Bush family all those years ago on a hot mic was not anything to turn your hair blue.
In fact, all he said was that a certain kind of woman tend to throw themselves at celebrities and allow certain 'liberties' to be taken.
Groupies, starfuckers, whatever you want to call them, have been grabbing celeb cock in the public domain since at least the 1960s, although the phenomenon obviously goes back to King David times. So, wow, just wow!
Now, compare this with the grabbing that goes on with regard to another even more intimate female body part, namely the uterus.
Since the Roe vs. Wade Supreme Court decision in 1973—a decision that forms one of the key pillars of the Leftist temple of Moloch and a decision that Hillary Clinton only ever speaks of in hushed tones of reverence—a staggering 58 million women in the US have been, so to speak, invasively "grabbed by the uterus," with the result that a similar number of human foetuses have been killed. In many cases, these have been late term abortions, where the act of homicide, implicit in most cases, has been blatant and obvious, even to the most nebulous thinkers on the Left, with the result that they avoid the horrifying imagery generated like a vampire avoids garlic.
But as long as the media can keep playing up "pussygate" and similar fake scandals with the last shards of their rotting credibility, the still benighted segment of the masses can be distracted from the venality of the Clintons, Hillary's willingness to serve as a dangerous tool for the globalist elites, and the smoking rape gun that has her husband's fingerprints all over it.
(Bill Clinton, as the Jimmy Saville of US politics, clearly can't die soon enough for the convenience of some people. If Hillary is elected, I give him six months at the most.)
But the stubbornness of the Trump campaign is proving dangerous to the established order because it is forcing them to show their hand and reveal their methods to an increasing number of people, who have been economically, emotionally, and now racially primed to see the manipulation that is under way.
A key element of this process is always to present everything out of proportion in such a way as to benefit the agenda. Nothing makes this clearer than the recent "Pussygate" scandal that was used by the backstabbing cuck tendency in the GOP—stand up Paul Ryan and the Bushes—to launch the latest, unsuccessful cuck d'etat against Trump, which, while it was live, was ably assisted by the mainstream media.
Maybe some future Wikileaks email drop will reveal that this move was triggered by growing Saudi—and therefore Bush—fears over a Trump presidency, intensified by the increasingly desperate state of the Wahabiist forces in the Syrian city of Aleppo. Trump famously does not care one jot about Saudi interests (and, in a touchingly naive way, about American petrodollar interests either.)
"Pussygate" is interesting because, once you get past the obviously vulgar tone (something that shouldn't be too hard in a society where major pop stars allow fans to fingerfuck them on stage and every city has a "Gay Pride" parade, where essentially anything goes), then what Trump actually said to the idiot scion of the Bush family all those years ago on a hot mic was not anything to turn your hair blue.
 |
| One of the more dignified pictures of groupies that I could find on the Internet. |
Groupies, starfuckers, whatever you want to call them, have been grabbing celeb cock in the public domain since at least the 1960s, although the phenomenon obviously goes back to King David times. So, wow, just wow!
Now, compare this with the grabbing that goes on with regard to another even more intimate female body part, namely the uterus.
Since the Roe vs. Wade Supreme Court decision in 1973—a decision that forms one of the key pillars of the Leftist temple of Moloch and a decision that Hillary Clinton only ever speaks of in hushed tones of reverence—a staggering 58 million women in the US have been, so to speak, invasively "grabbed by the uterus," with the result that a similar number of human foetuses have been killed. In many cases, these have been late term abortions, where the act of homicide, implicit in most cases, has been blatant and obvious, even to the most nebulous thinkers on the Left, with the result that they avoid the horrifying imagery generated like a vampire avoids garlic.
But as long as the media can keep playing up "pussygate" and similar fake scandals with the last shards of their rotting credibility, the still benighted segment of the masses can be distracted from the venality of the Clintons, Hillary's willingness to serve as a dangerous tool for the globalist elites, and the smoking rape gun that has her husband's fingerprints all over it.
(Bill Clinton, as the Jimmy Saville of US politics, clearly can't die soon enough for the convenience of some people. If Hillary is elected, I give him six months at the most.)
I used to want the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court Decision of 1973 to be overturned. I dislike the United States Supreme Court as an institution. I particularly dislike it when the Supreme Court overturns popular legislation that has been in effect for a long time. I thought Roe v. Wade was a flimsy piece of legal reasoning.
ReplyDeleteThen I read Freakonomics, by University of Chicago economist Steven Levitt and New York Times journalist Stephen J. Dubner.
These authors argue that the Roe v. Wade decision was the main reason for the decline in the rate of violent crime that began after 1991.
http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm
The argument is that the same kind of females who are most likely to have abortions are also most likely to raise boy babies who are likely to become violent street criminals when they grow up. Those females are unmarried, they have low IQ's, and they are marginally employable.
A potential armed robber, who was destroyed in the womb in 1974, would have been 18 in 1992.
I still think the Roe decision was a flimsy piece of legal reasoning. Nevertheless, the reasons presented in Freakonomics have turned me into a supporter of the Roe decision.