Luke Ford considers the irony of Richard Spencer calling nationalism a "shit magnet." Originally recorded 19th February 2021
Luke's YouTube channel
Luke's Soundcloud channel
Luke's Twitter
Luke's Twitter
Luke Ford considers the irony of Richard Spencer calling nationalism a "shit magnet." Originally recorded 19th February 2021
Luke's YouTube channel
I don't particularity like nationalism because I don't like territorialization (I prefer the Holy Roman Empire style of government), and because (like Creveld and Lind) I think nation states are nonfunctional bureaucratic parasites that can't be fixed, no longer have anyone's loyalty and will simply be destroyed whether anyone likes it or not. I don't have any particular problem with ethnic preferences or whatever, but I think prescriptions of nationalism to fix the problems of the modern world are a bit like prescriptions of Catholic monarchism to fix modernism - not going to happen. People should just figure out how they're going to organize themselves for a Lebanese style civil war and destruction of the monopoly state rather than fight yesterday's battles.
ReplyDeleteAlso, nationalism is related intrinsically to republicanism, liberalism and socialism and confusing an ethnic group for some political institution is bizarre.
BLACKS dont get it, the old WHITE (masters) order is dead...and a WE all must live under a new Mexican Olygarchy...
ReplyDeleteIt is unfortunately the case that the S*** Magnet term sums up the Right quite well. The so-called JQ bedevils the movement, and attracts people with a simplistic mono-track view who are inclined to blame everything on Jews. While I think most Jews are visceral opponents of white ethno-nationalists, most opponents of white nationalism are not Jewish—and to claim that all Western nations are controlled by secret committees of Jews is ridiculous. The globalists in a country like the UK are nearly all Gentiles. No UK newspaper has a Jewish editor. No UK newspaper is "owned" by Jews—most of them are listed companies that everyone's pension invests in. The UK mostly buys into globalist narratives largely out of our desperation to feel relevant by attaching ourselves to the US as a "poodle". In the US, the JQ is nearer to being a reality, but also not entirely true. The media, film industry, judicial, professorial and think-tank presence of Jews in the US is dozens of times the ratio in countries like Britain, while necessarily Gentile globalists in all these fields support the same agenda, and ultimately have the real power (by dint of numbers). I think the "front end" of the US state—the population-facing media end—is more Jewish, but the "back end" of the US state—the military-industrial complex, the Lockheed Martins, the Northrup Grummans, the Boeings, the spy agencies, etc—are mainly Gentile. This reflects the interest of high-verbal-IQ Jews in working for the media, rather than for defence agency contractors. But arguably the back end of the state is where the real power lies. Whatever the percentage of Jews in the CIA and the FBI, it's lower than it is at the New York Times and the Washington Post. While it is annoying to see the role of prominent Jews in pushing negative narratives—I'm thinking of Victoria Nuland and Antony Blinken pushing the anti-Russian foreign policy—in the end the real power in the US state has to be wielded by Gentiles in a country that is 98%-plus Gentile, and American globalist imperialism simply has joint Jewish and Gentile support at the elite level. This issue would probably be best retired from commentary by the Right altogether—and yet it performs a "totemic" role on the Right. If you are prepared to "call out" the Jews on Odyssey, it is a way of showing "I will never cuck"—although it immediately puts a low ceiling on any movement you're in.
ReplyDelete