Of course, THIS isn't "hate speech"... |
by Jack Grant
How would you like to fight the new secret
war, taking on the enemies of the new multicultural, borderless Britain one
social media website at a time?
Here's your chance to join the Britain's most well-funded secret army as a professional left-wing troller!
Here's your chance to join the Britain's most well-funded secret army as a professional left-wing troller!
Such is the message – effectively – in this job advert for a
Clapham based NGO called International
Alert which styles itself as an "international peace building"
outfit and apparently spends most of its time
interfering in the Third World. But now it has sniffed out an another source of money
available from the European Union for "combating hate speech".
Its “Communication and Europe Teams"
are running a short-term social media campaign (#EUnify) to counter racist and
xenophobic discourse in the UK in the run-up to the European elections." The ad was placed in an internal House of
Commons MPs website.
Anyone signing up for this is going to be a
very busy bee indeed ...posting, arguing and rebutting amplifying campaign messages, publishing
daily on various platforms, managing and moderating user generated
content... and so on. Combating hate speech has become something
of a new online Klondyke, with a river of European money available to those who
are willing to sit on their keyboards,
tweeting, posting all day. It is a job
tailor made for unemployable lefties.
One of the main outfits to corner a big
market share for this new racket is No Hate Speech, who have
hoovered up a lot of European Social Fund money. And of course it could hardly be a trans
national project without the UN
getting into the act. Most of this spending is focused on
combatting UKIP in the coming European elections, but you can bet your bottom euro that in the
finest public sector tradition the "problem" will still need lots
more funding after the elections are over. After all, the freedom of speech of the social media
is deeply worrying to the Left, so much so that, courtesy of the Minority Rights
Group, they recently held a hand wringing seminar on the subject.
Legislation was problematic, they thought,
because it could eventually be turned against them. Self-regulation is also not
ideal because of a lack of enthusiasm from ISPs. So the speakers agreed on a counter
strategy – aggressive "counter speech" or state funded propaganda to you and me.
This final strategy hinged on – surprise, surprise – a huge wedge of public money
being made available for the fight.
In their own words, "Counter speech
means raising awareness, improving education and building the capacity to speak out
against hate speech. NGOs and campaigns like the No Hate Speech Movement and the
Stop Racism and Hate Campaign are working towards these ends. Chris Whitwell
of Families, Friends and Travellers talked about his own organisation’s efforts
to challenge misconceptions and
stereotypes about Roma and Gypsies in the
media."
The MRG blogger warns gravely "the
events of Rwanda in 1994 offer a harrowing example of what can happen when the media becomes
an unchecked platform for hate." (As far as I remember, there
was no social media around at that time, but I’ll let it pass.)
There is a lot of encouragement for
nationalists to take from this farcical campaign.
First is how ineffectual it all is. Behind the fancy web
sites and the young women who enjoy posing for photographs, it is obvious that
there is a lot of log rolling going on. These are lefties and liberals, after all. They have never planned to do a hard day's work. They have joined up to these
organisations for lifestyle reasons, going to seminars in foreign countries, socialising
with like-minded types, patronising Third Worlders and most of all, congratulating
each other on their own righteousness.
Secondly, and more importantly, there is
the evidence that the opposition confidence in their project and the well paid jobs
that go with it, is wafer thin. This hysterical campaign against freedom of
speech means a total lack of confidence. And once they are defeated internally, in
their own minds, then it is ‘Game Over’ no matter how well funded their organisations
are.