by Duns Scotus
Without being an "Insider" it is difficult to know exactly what is going on in the world of politics and geopolitics today. In fact, you only have two options—either to be a dupe or a crank, namely to believe everything our "highers and betters" tell us or else to be stubbornly suspicious of it. I prefer the latter.
But one way we have of seeing inside the walls of power is to look at the odd coincidences that frequently occur in the news agenda. These can often be very revealing, especially if they all point in the same direction, as they appear to be doing at the moment.
There are a number of interesting things occurring at present, which seem to have a strange synergy or inverted synergy.
Right now in Syria, the government of President Bashar al-Assad is crushing the Ghouta Pocket, an enclave of rebel-held territory almost at the heart of Damascus. His past reluctance to attack this awkwardly-sited rebel pocket was because it would inevitably involve a large number of civilian casualties and provide an easy pretext for the West to up its intervention. After various successes elsewhere in the last year, Assad calculated that he was now strong enough to make this dangerous move, which if successful will greatly strengthen his power.
Of course Assad's main supporters in this endeavour, as well as his struggle to remain in control of Syria, are Iran and Russia. So it is interesting to note what appear to be two coincidental events, one pertaining to Iran and the other to Russia.
According to the mainstream media, Trump's reasons for sacking Rex Tillerson from the post of Secretary of State, and replacing him with some flunky from the CIA, are various or purely personal. But the important difference between the two men appears to be their views on how to deal with Iran.
Tillerson was much happier to accept the status quo of the deal made with Iran by President Obama, while Trump seems to be taking an increasingly Neocon and aggressive stance towards Iran, that also ties in rather well with his recent decision to move the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.
In fact, this difference on Iran is the only solid reason that really explains this sudden dismissal.
Coinciding—and indeed synergising—with this is the shitstorm currently underway over the attempted murder of an ex-Russian intelligence operative, Sergei Skripal, in the sleepy English town of Salisbury. He had spied for the UK in the past, been caught and convicted in Russia, and then exchanged in a spy-swap. BTW, Salisbury just happens to be adjacent to the UK's biggest chemical weapons centre at Porton Down. How convenient!
The British government has quickly come to the conclusion that this attempted murder was almost certainly the work of the Russian government, without going to the bother of proving this or getting to the bottom of the case. The government of Prime Minister Theresa May is now pushing for all kinds of sanctions against Russia, as well as raising the possibility of deplatforming the Russian news channel Russia Today.
It seems that what they have done to the Alt-Right they are now attempting to do to Russian supported media.
It is significant that this act of apparent poisoning occurred in the run up to the Russian presidential election—just as the murder of MP Jo Cox happened a few days before the Brexit vote.
It was always obvious that Putin was going to win this election, and he still is, but the Western Deep State’s game plan here is to try to hamstring the re-elected Putin by building up more international pressure and promoting colour-revolution-style opposition at home.
Painting Putin as a pissed-off, presidential poisoner who ruthlessly removes his opponents and dispatches dissidents is essentially a way to delegitimize him as much as possible. Such a move is intended either to stoke up enough opposition at home to destabilise his administration and bring him down, or, failing that, to push him on the defensive as much as possible, so that he loses his wider potency and ability to effectively support key allies like Iran and Syria.
It is hard not to see similarities between this and the efforts made to weaken and undermine Trump himself in his first year in power with the fake "Russia-gate" allegations.
With Russia weakened and destabilised in this way, and with a sensible moderate like Rex Tillerson cleared out of the State Department, the path towards a more proactive anti-Assad policy in the Middle East is greatly smoothed.
Now whose interests does that serve?
One more interesting coincidence is the fact that the British government needs a major distraction from yet another massive Muslim paedophile grooming scandal right now. A diplomatic war with Russia—along with a threat to the England football team participating in the World Cup to be held there later this year—serves that purpose perfectly.
But one way we have of seeing inside the walls of power is to look at the odd coincidences that frequently occur in the news agenda. These can often be very revealing, especially if they all point in the same direction, as they appear to be doing at the moment.
There are a number of interesting things occurring at present, which seem to have a strange synergy or inverted synergy.
Right now in Syria, the government of President Bashar al-Assad is crushing the Ghouta Pocket, an enclave of rebel-held territory almost at the heart of Damascus. His past reluctance to attack this awkwardly-sited rebel pocket was because it would inevitably involve a large number of civilian casualties and provide an easy pretext for the West to up its intervention. After various successes elsewhere in the last year, Assad calculated that he was now strong enough to make this dangerous move, which if successful will greatly strengthen his power.
Of course Assad's main supporters in this endeavour, as well as his struggle to remain in control of Syria, are Iran and Russia. So it is interesting to note what appear to be two coincidental events, one pertaining to Iran and the other to Russia.
Tycoons Trump and Tillerson |
Tillerson was much happier to accept the status quo of the deal made with Iran by President Obama, while Trump seems to be taking an increasingly Neocon and aggressive stance towards Iran, that also ties in rather well with his recent decision to move the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.
In fact, this difference on Iran is the only solid reason that really explains this sudden dismissal.
Coinciding—and indeed synergising—with this is the shitstorm currently underway over the attempted murder of an ex-Russian intelligence operative, Sergei Skripal, in the sleepy English town of Salisbury. He had spied for the UK in the past, been caught and convicted in Russia, and then exchanged in a spy-swap. BTW, Salisbury just happens to be adjacent to the UK's biggest chemical weapons centre at Porton Down. How convenient!
The British government has quickly come to the conclusion that this attempted murder was almost certainly the work of the Russian government, without going to the bother of proving this or getting to the bottom of the case. The government of Prime Minister Theresa May is now pushing for all kinds of sanctions against Russia, as well as raising the possibility of deplatforming the Russian news channel Russia Today.
It seems that what they have done to the Alt-Right they are now attempting to do to Russian supported media.
It is significant that this act of apparent poisoning occurred in the run up to the Russian presidential election—just as the murder of MP Jo Cox happened a few days before the Brexit vote.
It was always obvious that Putin was going to win this election, and he still is, but the Western Deep State’s game plan here is to try to hamstring the re-elected Putin by building up more international pressure and promoting colour-revolution-style opposition at home.
Painting Putin as a pissed-off, presidential poisoner who ruthlessly removes his opponents and dispatches dissidents is essentially a way to delegitimize him as much as possible. Such a move is intended either to stoke up enough opposition at home to destabilise his administration and bring him down, or, failing that, to push him on the defensive as much as possible, so that he loses his wider potency and ability to effectively support key allies like Iran and Syria.
It is hard not to see similarities between this and the efforts made to weaken and undermine Trump himself in his first year in power with the fake "Russia-gate" allegations.
With Russia weakened and destabilised in this way, and with a sensible moderate like Rex Tillerson cleared out of the State Department, the path towards a more proactive anti-Assad policy in the Middle East is greatly smoothed.
Now whose interests does that serve?
One more interesting coincidence is the fact that the British government needs a major distraction from yet another massive Muslim paedophile grooming scandal right now. A diplomatic war with Russia—along with a threat to the England football team participating in the World Cup to be held there later this year—serves that purpose perfectly.
Jacob Rees Mogg's stock took a huge hit this week, of course with his dog piling on this false flag, but also in a lesser seen interview where he extols the virtues of AI, robotics and automation and pooh poohs the peons' worry over their ability to keep body and soul together.
ReplyDeleteEverybody wins in this game. Putin will be re-elected with a big score (people rally around the leader when country is threatened, and the Russians even more so) while UK gets to play with vengeance what is its most important card in the Brexit negociations, that is : its strategic-military importance especially for the Est-European countries (Poland, Romania, Baltic States). These countries (former communist or once part of USSR) have always been very afraid of Russia and thus they are very pro-US, pro-UK and pro-NATO. Already Poland came out and voiced strong condemnation of Russia and support for the Brits. UK ambassador in Romania is touring the country and is opening consulates everywhere with abandon while stressing the strategic importance of UK for Romania "to counter the renewed Russian threat".
ReplyDeleteIt is a sort of false-flag, fake-flag, but most likely it was engineered by Russia as they needed the UK strong and "threatening Russia reaction" to have Putin elected with a large turnout and big-score, and they also knew that UK needed too such an incident so as to ramp the tension with Russia for Brexit-reasons.
It will die out after Putin's election and a successful for UK Brexit. Successful largely because EU is divided politically on security issues.
Pretty bad for that former spy, his daughter, a some police officer who got that terrible gas but such "incidents" are typical for the election season.
One may also recall here the manufactured Dutch-Turkey crisis (fortunately without victims) during the last Dutch-elections. A crisis which served both Erdogan and the Dutch political class/establishment. The crisis gave the Dutch-establish,ent the opportunity to "play tough" against Turkey, to move to the right politically, and thus fend off successfully the real populist and anti-Islamist challenge, that is Wilders' Freedom Party.
Everybody wins, save few innocents, with a helping (and cynical, criminal) hand, that of Putin.